Bridge Cameras!
From the Nikon p1000 to the cheaper end Kodak?
Some of these cameras have tremendos zooms, but they lack quality without a tripod and even then there is so much blur that is very similar to the cheaper versions bit of serious dissapointment to spending too much or to little?
Inbetween Panasonic, Sony, Fuji and Canon have a good slice of the market, with zooms going up to resonable lenghts and a fair stability!
Since one has a selection in this group it is hard to know where to start, one does like the Canon SX series from the 50 to the 70, but the SX70 now is so light it feels to fragile and it has not improved at all over that of the SX50?
These cameras a genearally good for all type of photography and film making, one loves aviation, buses and transport so most of my films goes to the Canon SX60-70, but I also like wildlife and the Panasonic FZ series has proved nice clear pictures!
The newer version is not as versitile as the one before and this is proving to be true with a lot of the makes in the Bridge camera field?
Some of these cameras have tremendos zooms, but they lack quality without a tripod and even then there is so much blur that is very similar to the cheaper versions bit of serious dissapointment to spending too much or to little?
Inbetween Panasonic, Sony, Fuji and Canon have a good slice of the market, with zooms going up to resonable lenghts and a fair stability!
Since one has a selection in this group it is hard to know where to start, one does like the Canon SX series from the 50 to the 70, but the SX70 now is so light it feels to fragile and it has not improved at all over that of the SX50?
These cameras a genearally good for all type of photography and film making, one loves aviation, buses and transport so most of my films goes to the Canon SX60-70, but I also like wildlife and the Panasonic FZ series has proved nice clear pictures!
The newer version is not as versitile as the one before and this is proving to be true with a lot of the makes in the Bridge camera field?