Unwittingly, the post I copied and pasted to my journal yesterday turned towards discussions of Twilight and themes found therein. The night before, I was sitting around a table with friends, discussing viewings of vampire related movies and series for a uni class in which one of the texts is Twilight. This morning, I found a post relating to
(
Read more... )
I don't quite agree with the starkness of the picture you've painted, but there's still certainly a bias toward the "classic" or canonical writers. I think it's partly to do with the conservative elitism that the Academy was founded on, and also partly staff and student preconceptions about what's worthy of study. The class I took last year on Renaissance writers was apparently very unpopular with students when it was just focused on little-known women writers, but shot up in popularity when Paul added Shakespeare to the syllabus.
I've been thinking a lot lately about how possible it is to work to radical ends within the Academy, given how essentially conservative it still is. The master's tools and all that. But then I think I've got to at least try, because the alternative is ceding the place to the likes of Harold Bloom and Keith Windshuttle, and that's just untenable.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment