For those that wonder...

May 20, 2005 11:45

Some of you know I used to be a Jehovah's Witness.
Well another ex-JW friend of mine sent me this, and damn if it ain't true.

You know you used to be a JW if. . . )

Leave a comment

countfeedback May 20 2005, 21:18:46 UTC
It's a cult. Plain and simple.

And fundamentalists and pentecostals are big on the "Don't do anything that's 'worldly'" campaign too. That's what always got me. They're segregationists. Delusional. There's only one world. Everybody has the same basic physical needs (food clothing shelter) and the same basic emotional needs (the need to 'matter', sex drive). The idea that you can not be a part of the world is just ridiculous.

Reply

bitchy_kitty May 20 2005, 21:35:31 UTC
Can you or Kait or anyone please explain this worldly is bad concept to me. I don't get it. In what context is "worldy" being used in this case?

Reply

perpetual_gb May 21 2005, 13:17:28 UTC
It's a bit difficult to explain. But basically the Jehovah's witnesses (and a few other fundie sects) believe they are "no part of this world"as they are followers of Christ's message and part of a Theocracy. In the case of Jehovah's Witnesses they do not vote, do not partcipate in "secular" social events such as prom and holidays, rarely listen to non spiritual music (which in the case of the JWs means nothing except some classical music, occasionally oldies (but even those can be harmful) and the orchestra music and piano music that you can get on tape that is a companion to the "sing praises" book (hymn book). This does not include "other" religion's music. They basicaly consider themselves seperate from all those that do not hold the same faith. And what is not the same as you is your "enemy" so to speak. A clue might be found in the first two definitions of the word secular ( ... )

Reply

bitchy_kitty May 22 2005, 20:51:10 UTC
Thank you for taking the time to explain that. I sort of understood the basic meaning, but not what actually living it would mean ( ... )

Reply

perpetual_gb May 21 2005, 13:18:02 UTC
I and many other EX-fundies agree.

Kait

Reply


Leave a comment

Up