Simultaneously Repulsive and Fascinating
Wandering the common room at work today, I stumbled upon something I found simultaneously repulsive and fascinating. Check it out:
Now, that the Hillbilly Herion Hero Himself would like to pose as Lord Nelson should come as no surprise, even to me, who knows enough about the fool to note the only place he deserves on a ship is as ballast. What came as a total shock, though, was the fact that this "news" letter cost suckers $34.95 per year, and is totally (as far as I can determine) not available online. Gee, I wonder why. No one on the internets would mock it, I'm sure. . . .
The real killer for all the folks out there was the back page.
The source is hard to read given that the Photobucket restricts pixals, so I won't bother making it larger for ya'll. The text makes reference to boffo box office and the fact that most attending are already "liberal activists." It then slams the Sierra Club for giving tickets away, claiming that inflated its BO, along with overblown "junk science."
Y'know, speaking of junk science, I have yet to hear one peep about the science questions I raised in the last post. beachofdreams, have you heard anything?
Funny how Limbaugh takes a page from his denial ilk and only questions the science behind GW without ever addressing it scientifically, then ignores those that offer correction and/or points to be clarified. It's almost as if they knew the answers, but found them to inconvenient to mention.
X-posted to boiling_frog
Now, that the Hillbilly Herion Hero Himself would like to pose as Lord Nelson should come as no surprise, even to me, who knows enough about the fool to note the only place he deserves on a ship is as ballast. What came as a total shock, though, was the fact that this "news" letter cost suckers $34.95 per year, and is totally (as far as I can determine) not available online. Gee, I wonder why. No one on the internets would mock it, I'm sure. . . .
The real killer for all the folks out there was the back page.
The source is hard to read given that the Photobucket restricts pixals, so I won't bother making it larger for ya'll. The text makes reference to boffo box office and the fact that most attending are already "liberal activists." It then slams the Sierra Club for giving tickets away, claiming that inflated its BO, along with overblown "junk science."
Y'know, speaking of junk science, I have yet to hear one peep about the science questions I raised in the last post. beachofdreams, have you heard anything?
Funny how Limbaugh takes a page from his denial ilk and only questions the science behind GW without ever addressing it scientifically, then ignores those that offer correction and/or points to be clarified. It's almost as if they knew the answers, but found them to inconvenient to mention.
X-posted to boiling_frog