Some weeks ago, I caught about five minutes of the Glee premiere before turning it off when the choir director's wife (I don't know anyone's names) made me want to attack her with a sharp, pointy object. Ah well, I figured, I didn't need another show anyway. But then all manner of my acquaintances, fannish and otherwise, have exploded with love for
(
Read more... )
As for your second set of questions/comments, I think I'd muse that of course there's great value in shows that are pure, un-thinky entertainment. I mean, for me this is the year of the silly cop show, so obviously you're not going to find me insisting that all shows should have some deep, thinky agenda.
But I also don't believe "it's just good fun" is a valid pass for problematic portrayals of women, or people of color, or anyone else. A show may have no deeper purpose than entertaining its audience for 45 minutes, and that's great, but I'd still like to see it doing so in an un-sketchy way. I, at least, am far more entertained when I am not cringing at the way certain characters are portrayed. Different people have different handwaving thresholds where this sort of thing is concerned, I think. TV is so full of racism and sexism and other forms of sketchiness that it would be hard to enjoy any of it if you had no capacity to handwave problematic thing X for the sake of enjoyment, but the question of where the problems start to outweigh the enjoyment is going to be different for everyone--and I suspect you and I have a different threshold for Glee, and that's absolutely fine!
Reply
Leave a comment