Oct 18, 2004 18:31
Originally posted by mkcee
...will all you Extremely Blind Lefties rush to blame Kerry for his mismanagement of the economy, as you guys seem to do with Bush? Will you whine about how the stock market fell during his term?
Or will you blame the terrorists? If you do, will you also admit that Bush had nothing to do with the stock market crash on 9-11?
I will be curious to see how you nuts handle all of this, being the sterling bastions of Truth and Honesty that you claim to be.
if kerry were president during 9/11, better yet, lets show a non-partisan being which is smarter than Bush:
If Mickey Mouse was president, I'm sure he would see there was no link between Iraq and 9/11. He would also had kept the inspectors in Iraq longer than a couple monthes. He wouldn't have been vacationing so much before 9/11 and he would have probably read those documents entitled, "Bin laden planes to bomb america with planes". I'm sure he would have spent so much money in Iraq and killed so many people just to capture Sadaam. He more than likely would have gotten Afghanistan (which is where Bin Laden was hiding) into a democratic state. If they had found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, he would have had the U.N. help him out. The american jobs would be so shitty because of him closing up the no taxes on imports deal, and the minimum wage would have been at 7 dollars by now, because thats what it takes in order to survive in america now.
If Mickey Mouse were president, we would have had it made right now.
One fault i have found in Kerry's plan that i'm sure cheapie guitarists won't like is he don't want us to trade with asian companies without there being taxes. so those 300 dollar agiles will be more like 360 dollar agiles.
which i am willing to give up that for better social security, healthcare, higher minimum wage, less taxes, a better economic system and for us to be a success in Iraq.
i read people saying that Kerry is a flip flop blah blah blah... I'm sure everyone in America wanted the Iraq war to happen. We all thought Iraq and Al Queda had direct links. That's what Bush had lead us to believe, and anyone who said different were cast out of society (dixie chicks, michael moore... yea i said michael moore. crucify me you communist bastards) Now we know they don't, and so by him saying "Wrong War, Wrong Place, Wrong Time'
he means:
wrong war - should have a lot more support, a lot more troops and a lot more supplies in Aghansitan
wrong place - afghanistan now
wrong time - iraq later
but the world is safer without Sadaam. so we would get to them after afghanistan. You can't just go over there and blow people up and expect for there to be a great outcome immeditaly. You have to gom one at a time. Afghanistan then Iraq, then Iran then Korea, then whatever is next.
but, now we're in Iraq because of Bush, and now we have to fix it. Bushs foreign policy didn't work, why not try Kerrys?
15,357 dead Iraqi civilians, and a 112 billion , expected to be 200 billion, dollar debt, but yet during wwii we liberated the jews easily 0 jewish deaths and the debt was placed on the offending country. Should we have 0 civillian deaths and the 112-200 billion dollar debt be placed on Iraq right now?