Leave a comment

barabaan January 15 2016, 12:45:32 UTC
Impacts, but not dramatically. I think its usefull for Russia.

Reply

peacetraveler22 January 15 2016, 12:46:25 UTC
In what way is it useful? To build domestic production and tourism?

Reply

barabaan January 15 2016, 13:03:58 UTC
yes, but at first we should learn how to live without oil rent. On our own labor.

Reply

askold_kr January 15 2016, 13:05:23 UTC
Дает стимул к перестройке структуры экономики.

Как раз то, что американцы называют умным словом diversification - в конце концов российская экономика будет меньше зависеть от продаж нефти и газа.

>written by alarmists and pessimists

Да достали уже эти ублюдки)). Причем самое забавное в том, что большая часть этих блоггеров живет в Москве и живет весьма и весьма зажиточно.

Reply

helga_weiss January 15 2016, 15:23:54 UTC
Domestic production doesn't help. For example, eggs from our russian chikens cost 70-100 rubles (30-40 last summer), milk from russian cows 50-70 (40-50 last summer). The only explanation: our chikens eat shredded dollars.

Reply

morang January 16 2016, 18:42:11 UTC
To understand and learn for good that throwing stones while living in glass house has consequences. That when you have 'bread', you'd better settle on living without state-provided 'circuses' of superpower grandeur than risk losing both due to defeat.

The lesson that an oil country should invest in diversification of its industry is already failed, I'm afraid. That ship has sailed.

Crisis feels in slow creep of some domestic prices and communal wages, in jobs shrinking, in prices on foreign goods (there are many, compare RU exports vs imports - remember me scared by ), in political rhetorics. Patriarch of Russian Orthodox Church has recently claimed that people who feel affected by crisis are 'unviable'. This week unviable pensioners in the famous Sochi held a protest against cancellation of mass transit discounts for them, blocking the street.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up