Leave a comment

Comments 20

thanatos_kalos December 25 2009, 19:45:55 UTC
Finally, a pay-off for the use of the name 'Harold Saxon'

In the sense of the Saxons invading and assimiliating/being assimilated? Or am I missing a medieval ref? (My history ends about 500AD with the words 'Nunc aliquid diuersum omnino erit' (and now for something completely different).

Reply

parrot_knight December 25 2009, 19:48:13 UTC
It's the idea of Harold II as England's lost hero-king, whom legend said survived Hastings and lived as a hermit/to a great age/to return at a time of England's greatest need. More obscure than Arthur in Britain or Fredericks I and II in Germany and Italy, but I'm sure it's occurred to Russell.

Reply

thanatos_kalos December 25 2009, 19:50:29 UTC
Ah! I didn't know about that. :)

Reply

(The comment has been removed)


pennypaperbrain December 25 2009, 23:34:15 UTC
Ponder says I'm to say that Ponder says that even a scriptwriter of the calibre of Robert Holmes had some trouble writing good scripts with the Time Lords in, and Russell T Davies is not of the calibre of Robert Holmes.

Reply

parrot_knight December 26 2009, 00:02:57 UTC
I think Russell T is of a similar calibre to Robert Holmes, but they are different sorts of writers who've had different careers and have contrasting outlooks on life. Holmes never had to run the series in the way that RTD has. As for the Time Lord question, I like The Deadly Assassin and think Holmes manages that well.

Reply

wonderwelsh December 26 2009, 14:03:30 UTC
And going by his comments on Confidential, Davies's take on the Time Lords is heavily influenced by Holmes's interpretation.

Reply


wonderwelsh December 26 2009, 14:02:09 UTC
Completely agree with your mini-review, Matthew.

I enjoyed it immensely, although clearly it was just an extended prelude to next week's finale. I wasn't sure about the Master's actions at first - they seemed a bit too 'out there' to take seriously. But the idea that such a drastic turn of events was actually a massive red herring - and basically a whimsical spur-of-the-moment decision taken by a madman for absolutely no reason - is truly creepy.

So the big reveal at the end saved the episode for me - not because it shocked me into forgetting what had gone before, but because, like all good twists, it transformed the way I saw the rest of the story so far.

I also agree that the use made of the recurring characters (Donna, Wilf and the Master) was effective in terms of their development and in terms of the actors' performances. Kudos to Tennant and Cribbins, in particular, who played that cafe scene beautifully.

Reply

parrot_knight December 27 2009, 13:14:06 UTC
It's appropriate for a last story for a regime that it should be crammed with incidents and plotlines that apparently are going to lead nowhere (though they yet might); and also a reflection on how many people experience their lives.

Reply

wonderwelsh December 28 2009, 10:07:17 UTC
Definitely, and it's even more appropriate for the first episode of a two-part story. I enjoyed it a lot and can't wait to see what happens next!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up