Delicious Pedo Tears

[palshife_sakura]

So I guess AlertPay found out that FurAffinity had furry babyfuck and dropped them like a hot potato. And a choice had to be made: defend "freedom of speech" or continue to be able to accept site donations. Guess which one was picked

Comments

[shade99]

Sorry, but this seems like such a glaring double standard that I have to call you on it.

Nevertheless, loli/shota has gotten a modicum of defense from me, because nobody is actually harmed in their creation, and such pictures are, if nothing else, a harmless outlet for less wholesome desires.

How is this different from cub art? Where are the harmed children?

But honestly, I think the psychological issues lie more with the 'haters' than anywhere else. I use 'issues' here loosely, as I don't suspect they're damaged or need professional help. Rather I think it's an emotional distaste that makes it harder to approach the subject in a rational manner. I used to be squicked by a lot of art. Usually if it involved violence, snuff or otherwise my kneejerk reaction had always been a little silent cry. I got over it though, and learned the hard way not to be so sensitive on those subjects in fictional depiction. I'm allowed to dislike it, just like they're allowed to draw it. My dislike doesn't swell to the proportions where I object to their existence or creative rights.

The rights in this case however are granted by a site.. and though the somewhat ambiguous grounds are cause for concern, I understand this policy had to come. It was a matter of time seeing the political climate around the world.

[palshife_sakura]

I'm sorry, maybe I should have made it clear that I hold cub art in the same regard, seeing as cub is furry loli/shota. No double standard with regard to this exists with me, I assure you.

[shade99]

Ah, so you used two terms for the same thing, makes sense now. I guess the preceding lines threw me off..