Torchwood, Friday Night Lights and Supernatural screencaps/gallery poll
Oh Torchwood, you are so silly and cheesy, and thank goodness you don't take yourself too seriously.
I made some screencaps, because Torchwood is pretty. And Supernatural caps because I was missing an episode, and Friday Night Lights, because it's also pretty.
[ Torchwood 2x02 - Sleeper - 1,350 caps (960 x 528) - gallery | zip 1 | zip 2 | sample ]
[ Supernatural 3x03 - Bad Day at Black Rock - 1,376 caps (1280 x 720) - gallery | zip 1 | zip 2 | zip 3 | zip 4 | sample ]
[ Friday Night Lights 2x06 - How Did I Get Here - 1,328 caps (960 x 528) - gallery | zip 1 | zip 2 | sample ]
All three galleries are working properly in all browsers. And on that note, I'm afraid I need a bit more testing help.
Basically, I'd really appreciate it if anyone who's likely to save caps from my galleries would take a look at the two galleries below and tell me which format they find easiest/quickest/best. (Ignore the colour schemes and the different gallery size - one is an old gallery from my previous site, and the other is one I've quickly cobbled together). I'll probably be converting all the current galleries up on the site to style two so they'll work in Firefox/Safari, as I can do that without huge amounts of reuploading, but I'd like to make any new galleries as user friendly as possible.
Style one - minimal, no slideshow, no ability to jump to later index pages unless you type it in the browser, does enable you to click quickly from one screencap to the next.
Style two - ExhibitPlus, no slideshow, can quickly jump to later index pages, can't click from one screencap to the next.
Poll Which gallery?
Any other thoughts would be welcome. I've been aiming to make the pages quick to load (hence small thumbnails), quick to navigate and easy to get back to the home page (which is why I don't use the popular Coppermine script), but I'd be interested to know what other characteristics you find useful.
ETA: I can't edit the poll, but if thumbnail size is an issue, would you let me know in the comments if you prefer the thumbnail size in style two (small thumbnails) (the one linked above) or in style two (larger thumbnails)? I'm particularly keen to hear from dial-up people, as I don't want to make the site hard for you to access.
I made some screencaps, because Torchwood is pretty. And Supernatural caps because I was missing an episode, and Friday Night Lights, because it's also pretty.
[ Torchwood 2x02 - Sleeper - 1,350 caps (960 x 528) - gallery | zip 1 | zip 2 | sample ]
[ Supernatural 3x03 - Bad Day at Black Rock - 1,376 caps (1280 x 720) - gallery | zip 1 | zip 2 | zip 3 | zip 4 | sample ]
[ Friday Night Lights 2x06 - How Did I Get Here - 1,328 caps (960 x 528) - gallery | zip 1 | zip 2 | sample ]
All three galleries are working properly in all browsers. And on that note, I'm afraid I need a bit more testing help.
Basically, I'd really appreciate it if anyone who's likely to save caps from my galleries would take a look at the two galleries below and tell me which format they find easiest/quickest/best. (Ignore the colour schemes and the different gallery size - one is an old gallery from my previous site, and the other is one I've quickly cobbled together). I'll probably be converting all the current galleries up on the site to style two so they'll work in Firefox/Safari, as I can do that without huge amounts of reuploading, but I'd like to make any new galleries as user friendly as possible.
Style one - minimal, no slideshow, no ability to jump to later index pages unless you type it in the browser, does enable you to click quickly from one screencap to the next.
Style two - ExhibitPlus, no slideshow, can quickly jump to later index pages, can't click from one screencap to the next.
Poll Which gallery?
Any other thoughts would be welcome. I've been aiming to make the pages quick to load (hence small thumbnails), quick to navigate and easy to get back to the home page (which is why I don't use the popular Coppermine script), but I'd be interested to know what other characteristics you find useful.
ETA: I can't edit the poll, but if thumbnail size is an issue, would you let me know in the comments if you prefer the thumbnail size in style two (small thumbnails) (the one linked above) or in style two (larger thumbnails)? I'm particularly keen to hear from dial-up people, as I don't want to make the site hard for you to access.