Food for Thought

Mar 08, 2009 19:21


So, I've been lately thinking about our favorite boys in 1965-1974 (pre-Roche case)...  this was the nostalgic point in the graphic novel, when Dan was fit/handsome and Rorschach was sane/articulate. And a lot of interesting questions came to mind ...I'm curious as to what you guys think.

1. When Nite Owl and Rorschach team up-- why would they team ( Read more... )

discussion, relationship, pre-graphic novel era

Leave a comment

scarlet_carsons March 9 2009, 14:26:36 UTC
1. Remember school? Remember how sometimes the weird kid and the nerdy kid would band together for mutual safety? It just seems to happen, like an unspoken arrangement. Yeah. That's what Rorschach and Nite Owl make me think of. They might've walked the same patrol routes for a while, and somehow Rorschach ended up hanging out in Daniel's basement ( ... )

Reply

mostepotente March 10 2009, 03:35:32 UTC
The class question interests me too (Not British, just a rabid devourer of BBCAmerica), and it's probably how Rorschach justifies the pilfering. Daniel's got more than enough money to throw around, he can stand to lose a few sugar cubes... and pounds (another justification for sugar cube theft).

Now, I realize that in my marathon reading session I missed a lot of the political context in the book. I know Rorschach reads "The New Frontiersman" which publishes some anti-Semetic material, but just because you read a paper doesn't mean you agree with everything published. Were there any other incidences?

Reply

foxypope March 10 2009, 05:27:10 UTC
Incidences of what, exactly?

Seeing as how he reveres the New Frontiersman rather than just simply **reading it**, I think it's safe to assume he agrees with every single thing that's said in that rag. He does, after all, trust his journal to the editors at the end of the book.

Reply

mostepotente March 10 2009, 06:02:13 UTC
Mmm, alternately they're the only rag that we see that comes out in support of the masks, bonus for being aligned with Rorschach's political beliefs. In some ways it makes sense to give it to them.

Reply

foxypope March 10 2009, 05:30:03 UTC
But that being said, I don't think Dan being upper-class, liberal, Jewish or fat detracts any respect he has for him. I think he makes special exceptions for Dan because he's a suit, and he's also his only friend. It's just like how he lets the Comedian be the sick rapist he is--just "moral lapses" in Rorschach's eyes.

Makes you wonder how he would see having any type of homosexual feelings toward Dan. Does he allow himself moral lapses?

Reply

mostepotente March 10 2009, 05:51:47 UTC
I could see either. One makes him more of Ozymandias in that "I'm special therefore the rules do not apply".

If we believe that Rorschach is Walter's idealized male figure (to compensate for Walter's percieved faults), then anything that doesn't fit in with Rorschach's ideal is Walter's fault. Because Walter is flesh and weak.

I wouldn't be surprised if there was self-flagellation invovled, to try and punish Walter for his weakness.

Reply

mostepotente March 10 2009, 06:06:57 UTC
So, which I've inarticulately blathered bakes down to:

1) Rorschach holds himself above the law so therefore his desires are not 'abnormal'.

2) Rorschach holds himself to higher expectations than he does on others (the more likely of the two in my opinion) and any imperfections become Walter "Whoreson" Kovac's fault.

I wonder how dead Walter really is...

Reply

scarlet_carsons March 11 2009, 00:42:33 UTC
'But that being said, I don't think Dan being upper-class, liberal, Jewish or fat detracts any respect he has for him.'

Yeah - Rorschach and Nite Owl probably had a whole slew of issues with each other, but they must've tolerated them because that's how long-term marriage works the positive stuff outweighed the negative.

Until Rorschach went crazy and Daniel quit, anyway.

Reply

suckmyglock March 21 2009, 12:12:20 UTC
I bet that in Rorschach's crazybrain being a wealthy Jewish banker and committing rape are about the same. Maybe the former is actually worse to him. After all being Jewish makes you part of the evil Zionist Conspiracy New World Order(!!!), but Sally was probably just a whore who got what was coming to her. He doesn't say that in front of Laurie but he'd think she was just a fool in denial of the truth.

Reply

scarlet_carsons March 11 2009, 00:35:02 UTC
If I recall correctly, Rorschach never actually says anything antisemitic. But he's such a dyed-in-the-wool right-wing nutcase AND a paranoiac that antisemitism seems weirdly in-character for him. (And wealthy jewish bankers are, like, a right-wing conspiracy theorist's wet dream.)

Reply

mostepotente March 11 2009, 02:24:53 UTC
Yeah, I suppose. This may be a case of geographical location effecting ones perception... I was born in the state that brought you Sarah Palin. So for me there are shades of "right wing". I'd have to see more of Rorschach to make a call on whether he's tomato or burgundy.

Reply

but just because you read a paper doesn't mean you agree with everything published hohaiyee June 23 2010, 00:05:28 UTC
YES

This is what gets me about extreme democrat party mediums, and their audience

...and the extreme republican party mediums, and their audience

I dunno which came first but I would like to stab both, in the gut.

What was so funny about the forgot Poland? I can see how one might laugh about it while high, but otherwise...it's just as cheap as laughing at Obama's middle name.

I think it's always a good sign when you find disagreement with your regular newspaper.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up