(no subject)
So apparently the DC Metro is allowing this ex-gay religious group to advertise on the metro. It kind of pisses me off [not to mention the pro-life ads but that's a different story]. My friend wrote them a letter about it and they responded about some bullshit about first amendment rights and anyone being aloud to advertise as long as it wasn't pornographic. Which bothers me on several levels.
First of all, pornographic images are not allowed because they offend someone. But everything else is allowed no matter if it offends someone or not.
Second, if there were ads about how one should change their race, or religion, because thier current race or religion is wrong, then this would be considered discrimination and no way would DC Metro allow it. So whats the difference?
So many things at the moment makes me want to bang my head against the wall. Just because of the stupidity and the frusteration of it all. It is just not my day.
First of all, pornographic images are not allowed because they offend someone. But everything else is allowed no matter if it offends someone or not.
Second, if there were ads about how one should change their race, or religion, because thier current race or religion is wrong, then this would be considered discrimination and no way would DC Metro allow it. So whats the difference?
So many things at the moment makes me want to bang my head against the wall. Just because of the stupidity and the frusteration of it all. It is just not my day.