Thinking over my remark in yesterday's post about having read several books that were well on in related series, that these particular volumes were not perhaps the place to start, I wondered, Why Not?
In the course of many decades' reading I have read a fair number of sequences myself out of order, for a whole range of reasons, either because that
(
Read more... )
With looser sequences like the Discworld series I'm less bothered - Wyrd Sisters, for instance, is a perfectly good place to start, because the first two or three aren't that great. On the other hand, each of the series within the sequence is best read in order - Guards, Guards before Men at Arms or Witches Abroad before Lords and Ladies, for instance - because they really do build on the previous volumes, and while you can certainly follow the story of Men at Arms without having done so, you're going to miss a lot of the detail.
Also, series I'm not that invested in can be read out of order - I recently read one of Lindsey Davis' Falco books, having jumped a couple, but I didn't mind because I'm not particularly invested in reading everything she writes.
Hm. Basically, I think it boils down (for me) to: read in order if you can, but if you can't that's not totally disastrous. But given a choice with a real series, I do definitely like to go in order, and ideally without knowing how it all turns out.
Reply
On the other hand, I wouldn't recommend reading the Tiffany Aching books out of order, personally. There's a much tighter continuity there than in most of his stuff.
Reply
Leave a comment