Is there not a different question there?

Mar 24, 2014 15:13


Okay, I do wonder if this is somebody endeavouring to wind PSC up:
My fetishes (plushophilia and hard vore) are basically the only things that can do it for me. If a woman wants to try something intimate but without either of those kinks she can't get any reaction from me. I've lost one relationship partly due to this problem.

The question arises as to whether he needs another person at all? It's not clear to me whether he requires a partner to be plushophile and engage in hard vore with?

I'm not entirely sure what basis for negotiation with someone who is kink-friendly but doesn't actually have matching fetishes there might be, if the querent can't do anything 'without either of those kinks', in a 'mutual exchange of styles'. It seems to me to rather limit the range of what might be possible. Not to mention that I have gained the impression that furries occupy a rather lowly place in the kink hierarchy...? which might also affect the situation. Though I'm not sure whether, as problem is described, he is actually a furry, or just very, very fond of his teddybear.

This entry was originally posted at http://oursin.dreamwidth.org/2066486.html. Please comment there using OpenID. View
comments.

advice, fetishism, columnist, sex

Previous post Next post
Up