archaism
you know why modern portraits look nothing of the past? past implying rembrandt, that is, kiddies-
its because the modern painters neglect to see the beauty of the archaic. archaics are nearly always unnoticed and consistantly over looked (just to double state my meaning).
i see the archaics and i know who they are.
i am going to portray the archaic. i am not going to mimic the old, but i am going to realize their beauty and show forth.
modern beauty is not.
archaism is go.
and to those who might still care to read this, might i mention a few of you who are, indeed, archaic:
-paranoid
-james, from what i have seen
-jen s.
-seth
-claire darling
formost runner, of my archaic genre, is dylan. congratulations, your genes have survived throughout the last 3-6 centurys to bring forth the appearance of a people seemingly long lost.
i praise your genetic material, as well as your wonderfully growing music taste and mental realiztions.
vive.
goodnight.
its because the modern painters neglect to see the beauty of the archaic. archaics are nearly always unnoticed and consistantly over looked (just to double state my meaning).
i see the archaics and i know who they are.
i am going to portray the archaic. i am not going to mimic the old, but i am going to realize their beauty and show forth.
modern beauty is not.
archaism is go.
and to those who might still care to read this, might i mention a few of you who are, indeed, archaic:
-paranoid
-james, from what i have seen
-jen s.
-seth
-claire darling
formost runner, of my archaic genre, is dylan. congratulations, your genes have survived throughout the last 3-6 centurys to bring forth the appearance of a people seemingly long lost.
i praise your genetic material, as well as your wonderfully growing music taste and mental realiztions.
vive.
goodnight.