Your quote of the day...

Aug 02, 2006 20:38

"But goodness alone is never enough. A hard cold wisdom is required, too, for goodness to accomplish good. Goodness without wisdom invariably accomplishes evil."
- Robert Heinlein

And to make this entry a little more interesting than just that... Ask me a question. One question, whatever you like. Ask and I will answer, as truthfully as I am

meme

Leave a comment

[locked to Norman] webstunner August 3 2006, 02:12:14 UTC
Only one? How did you help Reilly? I'd like to know, in case there's ever...another emergency.

Reply

Re: [locked to Norman] osborn_journals August 3 2006, 02:43:40 UTC
Well, you can ask more. There's just no guarantee that I'll answer truthfully. I talked with him -- just that. Just with Reilly, the other aspects not interfering. He was... distressed, unhappy with the state of certain affairs. I convinced him, as much as I could, that things weren't as bad as they seemed, and that certain options he'd dismissed out of hand were... more feasible than he'd made himself think.

Nothing much more, really.

Reply

Re: [locked to Norman] webstunner August 3 2006, 02:58:18 UTC
*laughs, nervously* Distressed, really? You think? ...Sorry. So you just talked -- like, in his mind? 'Cause Hornhead didn't look that chatty to me.

I guess that's good. Nice to know we won't have to go to the Nexus to if something happens. Not that I'm not grateful, but you know better than anyone what I put him through that night. I'm not doing that to him again.

You say that like I can be sure you're telling me the truth now. No offense.

Reply

Re: [locked to Norman] osborn_journals August 3 2006, 03:17:46 UTC
Essentially, yes. It would have been rather more complicated if Murdock hadn't been helping, of course.

Come now. Do I look like the sort of man... shaped... creature who would break the sacred trust of a recycled internet truth-meme?

Reply

Re: [locked to Norman] webstunner August 3 2006, 03:29:20 UTC
Of course you do! On opposite day.

Actually...you do look a lot someone I'd trust with an internet meme, at least. Oh, but alas! The resemblance is only skin deep.

((Arrgh, I'll have continue this tomorrow. Night!))

Reply

Re: [locked to Norman] osborn_journals August 3 2006, 04:01:32 UTC
'Alas!' indeed. Those poor meme-spreaders, they knew not what havok their innocent works would wreak, when corrupted by villains such as I.

(...also, I feel you should know that the use of that icon is extremely disconcerting. Just -- for the record.)

((Night! Sleep well. :D And if he can't actually see the icon, I can certainly delete.))

Reply

Re: [locked to Norman] webstunner August 3 2006, 20:35:12 UTC
What a tangled web we weave when first learn to, uh, not decieve?

(...you can see my icons? Oh! Oh. It doesn't work that way on this end. This -- this is going to disturb me than it disturbs you, old man.)

((Thank you, I did! And, argh, I didn't even consider that...but I don't mind, it works! May has said she can't see people's usernames, so why would she be able to see their icons?))

Reply

Re: [locked to Norman] osborn_journals August 4 2006, 00:12:30 UTC
Or just 'look at the damn mess you get when you try to un-tangle all of it.' Perhaps.

(I can indeed. And for both our sakes, I will say nothing else on the topic.)

((Well, I figure they can be seen on journal entries/text access, anyway. Seeing as... they're supposed to be about the same as we see them. I usually don't factor it in, even so, but that particular icon... Something had to be said. XD))

Reply

Re: [locked to Norman] webstunner August 4 2006, 03:44:00 UTC
That's a good one.

(And that's probably best.)

((But of course! One must make an exception for such special occassions.))

Reply

Re: [locked to Norman] osborn_journals August 4 2006, 21:08:55 UTC
Indeed. On both counts.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up