There seems to be a predictable trajectory for people who get
interested in
Vipassana
meditation. At first it’s all about information-gathering:
learning as much as one can about the dhamma by inhaling Buddhist books
and
dhamma talks.
Not surprisingly, when I went through that phase, I did it to the
nines. From 2004 through 2008, I read voraciously and attended
hundreds of dhamma
talks at
CIMC,
absorbing as much as I could. But I also plundered the internet,
downloading and listening to (without exaggeration) a couple thousand
dhamma talk podcasts, particularly by
Ajahn
Brahm of the BSWA and
Gil Fronsdal of
IMC.
A couple years ago, I finally reached the saturation point. The subject
matter of the talks had become very familiar-almost second-nature to
me-and my beginners’ enthusiasm slowly waned, giving way to a mild
annoyance when a live dhamma talk would be followed by people asking the
same redundant and off-topic questions during the usual post-talk Q&A. I
found myself feeling frustrated that CIMC’s speakers had to limit their
talks to an introductory level, since a fair percentage of their
audience are beginners. And I wanted to look into the topics in more
detail than a single 45-minute talk could allow.
It was time for me to move on.
CIMC also hosts a handful of standing practice groups that meet on a
weekly basis. I attended a few of these (specifically on
metta, wise
speech, and moving from reactivity to discernment) and found them
useful, but they typically meet about eight times, so it felt like the
group disbanded as soon as it had gained that sense of continuity I
was looking for. It seemed a bit silly to attend the same practice group
multiple times, and I wasn’t interested in attending other practice
groups whose topics weren’t of value to me.
Just recently, I found my way to another CIMC practice group
called the “Long-Term Yogi” program. It’s a
more permanent standing group of experienced practitioners, so they get
into topics in much more depth, and the participants tend to stay with
it for a much longer period of time, so there’s real continuity
from month to month and year to year.
The downside is that one has to obtain permission from the teacher to
attend. I was asked to assemble a brief history and describe the current
state of my practice in order to justify my participation, then wait for
the teacher to judge me worthy or unworthy. It was a very uncomfortable
exercise in ego and self-aggrandizement and then awaiting judgment…
from a place that typically discourages all that. But in the end I was
accepted and enrolled in the program.
So far I’ve been to two (weekly) meetings, and have enjoyed them quite a
bit. We’re going slowly through the
Eightfold Path, examining each path
factor in great depth. This fall the group will focus on the latter two
(out of four) aspects of
wise speech: harsh speech and idle speech, both of which are of particular interest to me. The
atmosphere is very collegial, and the weekly contact with CIMC teacher
Narayan is also very valuable.
I’m really very optimistic that the LTY program is where I belong right
now. It seems like the perfect venue for deepening my practice while
benefiting from the consistent support of a great teacher and other
knowledgeable and experienced practitioners.
Like my wonderful
Kalyana Mitta
group (which has been running for nine months and I am remiss in not
having mentioned before), the LTY program feels like the embodiment of
sangha: a
semi-permanent supportive community of dedicated practitioners. I am
very fortunate to have been welcomed into these two groups; they both
feel very comfortable and right, like the true refuge that sangha is
supposed to be. They give me great optimism for my practice and its
future evolution.