Our new homo overlord
См. приведенные ниже куски статьи.
А на хера это всё? Быдлу достаточно Графиков, Таблиц и Ежедневных цифр - как миленькие наденут намордники и будут сидеть по конурам в комендантский час, теша самолюбие очкастого гомофюрера и его прихлебателей, по которым за их "руководство", пуля вполне плачет и они ее на 10 тысяч процентов заслужили.
Отсюда
A group of Australia's leading infectious disease experts is pushing for the Victorian government to be more transparent with its coronavirus data, arguing a stark lack of detail is hindering their ability to properly analyse the state's unfolding crisis.
"The first question is what data do the government actually have? Because they haven’t really told us," said epidemiologist Professor John Mathews from the University of Melbourne.
"If the government wants to have the confidence of the population, then it should be prepared to be transparent on what data it has and what it hopes to do with that data to improve things."
Rather than just raw numbers and postcodes, Professor Mathews wants the government to provide a list of data items collected during testing and contact tracing, such as: whether a person was symptomatic; what symptoms they presented with; whether they were close contacts of a positive case; and a breakdown of turnaround times for test results.
He suspects long delays in the processing of COVID-19 test results be one of the reasons behind the increasing number of people flouting quarantine measures.
He said a lack of detail was making it increasingly hard to scrutinise effectiveness of the government's containment measures and inhibiting experts from making informed analysis or predictions.
"They need to explain how the data is being used to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of its disease-control measures. The capacity to improve the situation depends upon making all the time lags as short as possible."
Epidemiologist Tony Blakely from University of Melbourne agrees. He believes if more information was released it would help Victorians better understand why the cases continue to rise and they would be more likely to "buy into the mission and work together to stop the spread."
"We as a citizenry need better data," Professor Blakely said. "We don't want to just be berated about behaving badly. We want to know why [the cases are increasing] ... how we can fix it. Everybody needs to feel like they are in the control room."
"At the moment we are only getting one positive case in every 100 or so tests," he said. "We are being told to get a test for any old symptoms, a runny nose or cough ... but is there actually any analysis on what should especially drive you to get a test? If we could focus our testing a little bit it would help virologists get through the load."
Professor McLaws also backed calls for the government to release more data to reassure the public it was moving towards controlling the outbreak.
"One of the most important things in any is democracy is openness," Professor McLaws said. "Australia has been fortunate in that we have had some of the data shared, but I do think the quality of the data could be improved. If this was done we might be able to be of some more assistance and advice, rather than simply giving commentary based on our own experience."
А на хера это всё? Быдлу достаточно Графиков, Таблиц и Ежедневных цифр - как миленькие наденут намордники и будут сидеть по конурам в комендантский час, теша самолюбие очкастого гомофюрера и его прихлебателей, по которым за их "руководство", пуля вполне плачет и они ее на 10 тысяч процентов заслужили.
Отсюда
A group of Australia's leading infectious disease experts is pushing for the Victorian government to be more transparent with its coronavirus data, arguing a stark lack of detail is hindering their ability to properly analyse the state's unfolding crisis.
"The first question is what data do the government actually have? Because they haven’t really told us," said epidemiologist Professor John Mathews from the University of Melbourne.
"If the government wants to have the confidence of the population, then it should be prepared to be transparent on what data it has and what it hopes to do with that data to improve things."
Rather than just raw numbers and postcodes, Professor Mathews wants the government to provide a list of data items collected during testing and contact tracing, such as: whether a person was symptomatic; what symptoms they presented with; whether they were close contacts of a positive case; and a breakdown of turnaround times for test results.
He suspects long delays in the processing of COVID-19 test results be one of the reasons behind the increasing number of people flouting quarantine measures.
He said a lack of detail was making it increasingly hard to scrutinise effectiveness of the government's containment measures and inhibiting experts from making informed analysis or predictions.
"They need to explain how the data is being used to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of its disease-control measures. The capacity to improve the situation depends upon making all the time lags as short as possible."
Epidemiologist Tony Blakely from University of Melbourne agrees. He believes if more information was released it would help Victorians better understand why the cases continue to rise and they would be more likely to "buy into the mission and work together to stop the spread."
"We as a citizenry need better data," Professor Blakely said. "We don't want to just be berated about behaving badly. We want to know why [the cases are increasing] ... how we can fix it. Everybody needs to feel like they are in the control room."
"At the moment we are only getting one positive case in every 100 or so tests," he said. "We are being told to get a test for any old symptoms, a runny nose or cough ... but is there actually any analysis on what should especially drive you to get a test? If we could focus our testing a little bit it would help virologists get through the load."
Professor McLaws also backed calls for the government to release more data to reassure the public it was moving towards controlling the outbreak.
"One of the most important things in any is democracy is openness," Professor McLaws said. "Australia has been fortunate in that we have had some of the data shared, but I do think the quality of the data could be improved. If this was done we might be able to be of some more assistance and advice, rather than simply giving commentary based on our own experience."