A Guatemalan mother who says her child was stolen and later turned over to a U.S. couple for adoption said Tuesday that she will go to a Missouri court seeking to get her daughter back now that the U.S. State Department has said it doesn’t have jurisdiction to help return the girl.
The State Department confirmed Tuesday that it has informed
(
Read more... )
(The comment has been removed)
It's hard and there are no winners in any of this, so my friends are in the process of adopting a girl from a Russian orphanage and a girl from china.
Reply
Reply
Reply
It would be incredibly less devastating for the birth mother, and might well raise the number of children being offered (although not every adoptive parent would be interested in sharing like that; some of them are quite disdainful or paranoid, but I honestly don't give a fuck if they don't get any kids ever).
Reply
way to be crappy, until you're in that situation you don't know how you're going to react so keep the judgment of people in incredibly painful, scary, emotionally traumatizing situations at bay.
Reply
like, i'm glad you've decided i should never be a parent? gfy.
Reply
Most likely I wasn't talking about you, but about the adoptive parents and potential adoptive parents in the horror stories I've heard from birth mothers. I seem to have worded it badly, for which I apologize.
Reply
No, I don't want to leave open the possibility that the birth parent could emerge from the woodwork years later and exercise custody options to take a legally adopted child away. This has nothing to do with prejudice toward birth parents and everything to do with not wanting to enable "takebacks" of a family that already faces enormous social and legal challenges in the search for validation and authenticity.
A birth mother certainly has the right to choose the adoptive parents, no question. But that's a faaar cry from "they should retain legal rights and/or custody of the child". Because that? That's not adoption. It's just cruelty, for everyone involved.
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
But why would you codify the ability of someone to do such a thing in law? That's just an awful thing to inflict on everybody, and pretty much nullifies the entire practice.
I mean, there's definitely a place for that, where parents may be willing and able to take over custody and care of their biological children again? But it's foster care, not adoption.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
And quite frankly I don't have a whole lot of faith in the courts, because they do all sorts of shit when it comes to overriding 'unconventional' families, like throwing out wills or power of attorney or custody of same-sex partners, especially in states without second-parent adoption (which most states DON'T have), so. Yeah, I have issues with this.
Reply
Reply
I've heard plenty of birth mothers talk about being treated like shit by the people who were trying to adopt their babies, sometimes in reaction to a change of heart by a birth mother who decides she can't give her baby up and sometimes in an attempt to pressure the birth mother to go through with the adoption, and sometimes as mere disdainful classism by some Nice Christian Married Couple who just want the slut to hand over her baby and get out of their lives so they can pretend she never had a part in their precious angel's life.
I'm reasonably sure that if I'm ever in that situation I still won't slut-shame a birth mother, call her trash to her face, tell her she doesn't deserve the baby or call her an unfit mother based on her preference to keep it, and if I did, I would be every bit as much of an asshole as I just called them.
Ditto for if I ever attempted a closed adoption, or attempted to lose contact or deny contact with a birth mother whom I'd had an open adoption with, for anything short of abuse of our child by ( ... )
Reply
Leave a comment