G-spot found: Researcher locates elusive pleasure zone

Apr 25, 2012 18:40

Within the confines of science and the bedroom, the G-spot is something of a holy grail.

For decades, researchers have debated its existence in medical journals, while Lotharios have implied with a wink they already made the discovery.

But none went so far as Adam Ostrzenski, a retired doctor and researcher who travelled to Poland this past September ( Read more... )

science, sex, women

Leave a comment

cozmic_oceanz April 25 2012, 17:53:42 UTC
I thought everyone decided two months ago that it didn't exist?

Reply

chaya April 25 2012, 20:38:07 UTC
Everyone except anybody who has a vagina or has had any decently explorative sex with somebody who has a vagina.

I still want to smack whatever scientists came out with that nonsense.

Reply

nyxelestia April 25 2012, 23:00:35 UTC
I think it's an "everyone's different" thing. Some women say there is a spot in side their vagina which causes great pleasure for them during penetrative sex, others say there isn't and it's all clit for them.

Reply

chaya April 25 2012, 23:17:25 UTC
I think you missed my point, which is that the myth perpetuated by society and media that 'normal' women can quite easily orgasm from penetrative sex is completely false. All women are indeed different, and seriously hooray for the women that can orgasm from PIV, but they are not in fact the norm.

Reply

nyxelestia April 26 2012, 05:21:13 UTC
I think I assumed that whenever popular media hinted at sex/women coming from PIV alone, it was so obviously off/male-serving that it was in the same line as fantasy and sitcom romance of "we all know it's wrong, just go with it anyway", and everyone knew that wasn't quite all it took.

Certainly when growing up very few guys I knew were concerned about G-spots, mostly they asked us girls about clits and such. I didn't think that many people actually believed women came from PIV alone. o.O Maybe it's some weird generational thing I'm missing? IDEK...

Reply

tnganon April 26 2012, 06:42:24 UTC
that is actually the opposite of how i'm reading your comment so i'm not surprised someone else did as well

Reply


Leave a comment

Up