I hope all of those Republicans who claim that this administration spends too much sees this article. Of course, I suppose it can be claimed that the Republican-controlled House was partly responsible, too. There are charts in the linked article.
Barack Obama, Austerity PresidentImagine an alternate reality where the first term of President
(
Read more... )
Reply
The austerity measures are a problem over here as well - government job losses are a huge factor in the meager net gains from month to month over the last three years, and many gains are in spite of and not because of austerity - but the complicating factor is less the overall size of government being small, and more that it's happening on a state and local level. If Minnesota loses 5,000 state/local government jobs in a given month, Massachusetts won't notice or be affected in any direct way. Federal job losses have been relatively minor compared to state and local (and federal employment affects Virginia, DC and Maryland more than any other states, and VA and MD have been doing pretty well comparatively).
So it's like, the job losses in government are big, but they're so decentralized and generally not federal, so the national media doesn't really connect the dots that well.
Reply
Reply
Reply
I guess it's also helped by the lack of (or tenancy to ignore) unions? When the NHS is attacked, the medical unions are well funded and placed to kick up shit - and they have a voice in our Opposition Government. It must be absolutely impossible to connect, say, job losses in Minnesota to Massachusetts - but if there was a (scaled up) unionisation of government workers then it's more likely national media would report it.
Reply
And our national media is less than shit. They really shy away from covering things that might tick off the right wing, in part because a lot of our media is owned by the right wing.
Reply
Leave a comment