It's quite pathetic how you're trying to downplay this. I assume if the chair of, say, the Illinois Tea Party had a website promoting neo-Nazis and Holocaust deniers, that would not reflect negatively on the Tea Party either?
Besides, he made these blog posts months ago - why haven't they kicked him out, or at least taken his title away yet?
So, to go back to my Tea Party analogy - that would not be deserving of "an entire post" either? (I mean, it's just ONTD Political after all - I'm not calling for it to make the front page of the NYT.)
That website is quite a messy eyesore, but I couldn't find anybody else named as chair on there either.
He chaired a PSC event that featured an MP - doesn't sound that insignificant to me.
Isn't the Tea Party kind of a rag-tag bunch?
I'm not anti-Islam, just anti-Islamism - it's sad that you don't see the difference. But even if I were, I'm not a member of any Zionist organization, much less a prominent one with a public role, so your analogy is bizarre.
(The comment has been removed)
Besides, he made these blog posts months ago - why haven't they kicked him out, or at least taken his title away yet?
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
That website is quite a messy eyesore, but I couldn't find anybody else named as chair on there either.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Isn't the Tea Party kind of a rag-tag bunch?
I'm not anti-Islam, just anti-Islamism - it's sad that you don't see the difference. But even if I were, I'm not a member of any Zionist organization, much less a prominent one with a public role, so your analogy is bizarre.
Reply
Leave a comment