I know a lot about image editing, and I have no idea what it's supposed to prove, either. Maybe that the bulge shot was manipulated in some way, but I don't know that it narrows down that that area of the screengrab was edited or enhanced by Breitbart, or whether the photo itself was edited by (presumably) Weiner. In the absence of the original, there might not even be a way to narrow that down.
And there's also danceprincess20 below saying she witnessed it live on Weiner's yfrog.
Yeah, the picture was def. uploaded to his real yfrog account. Even if that picture was edited (and there is no reason why it would have been), there was no reason to do that. Even Weiner has as much as admitted that it was uploaded (by someone else according to him).
Well, his fb account was hacked and most likely he had it linked to his twitter and photo account. A lot of people do...or at least they have it when they sign into one account they are signed into the other...or they have the same pw.
So that doesn't really prove anything except the hackers getting into his account and making mayhem.
Comments 116
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
;)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
And there's also danceprincess20 below saying she witnessed it live on Weiner's yfrog.
Reply
Reply
So that doesn't really prove anything except the hackers getting into his account and making mayhem.
This is more and more looking like a RightWing set-up.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/05/29/980400/-Breitbarts-#TwitterHoaxHow-It-Went-Down
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Yeah, joining the chorus of not-shocked at all.
Reply
Leave a comment