Leave a comment

Comments 4806

piratesswoop June 16 2009, 15:38:56 UTC
the fact that i brought up iran on ONTD and someone asked "wait, what's happening" is really making me, idk, depressed?

Reply

bluetooth16 June 16 2009, 15:40:48 UTC
ONTD tends not to be the greatest place for discussion of international issues. All they care about is Hannah Porntana '09.

Reply

lone_concertina June 16 2009, 15:51:34 UTC
wtf is Hannah Porntana

Reply

jmclive June 16 2009, 15:53:19 UTC
there are pictures of Hannah Montana blowing some guy.

Reply


fruityphobia June 16 2009, 16:00:07 UTC
The NYT article broke my heart..

“Here is my country,” a young woman said to me, voice breaking. “This is a coup. I could have worked in Europe but I came back for my people.” And she, too, sobbed.

Reply

dejla June 17 2009, 16:46:25 UTC
Yes, mine too.

Reply


schmiss June 16 2009, 15:42:43 UTC
Here are some things I've recently re-Tweeted:

RT @chrislhayes To all the labor haters out there; wherever there's an authoritarian regime, labor is fighting it. http://bit.ly/11QkiA

RT @jimsciuttoABC: #iranelection Iran has banned all foreign journalists from reporting on the sts.

RT @jryanlaw PLEASE READ! Please read this before you mindlessly retweet Iran-related tweets - http://bit.ly/9NfTP

If you are on Twitter, I definitely recommend reading the last one.

Reply

jorajo June 16 2009, 16:10:16 UTC
I just followed you bb. Thank you for that last link. I'm trying to be cautious about what I read.

Reply

ahtefeh June 16 2009, 19:55:53 UTC
Are we still not allowed to use for example '@stopahmadi' or '@persiankivi'? Cause I got yelled at last night when I retweeted something. Are we still supposed to write 'RT in Iran'?

Reply


madali June 16 2009, 15:43:02 UTC
And I wrote this on my journal, and I think it bears repeating, because I havent seen any blogs to such comparisons,

Interior Ministry releases provincial vote countThis means that they ARE getting concerned and are now trying to cover their tracks. Of course, the people in charge are really mishandling this fraud. While initially it might appease certain people, because numbers do always seem impressive, I think this makes it easier to prove it there were concerns over the results. It just makes it easy to compare these numbers with 2005 numbers. I'm mainly comparing Karoubi & Ahmedinijad because it is easier to compare them since they were both candidates. A quick summary, in 2005, the election went to second round as no one got above 50% votes In 2005, Ahmedinijad's first round votes were 20%, and Karoubi was 18%. He didn't go to the second round, because Rafsanjani was 22%. This time it didnt even go to the second round, because Ahmadinijad got 62% while Karoubi got LESS THAN 1%! I cant imagine so much change in a mere 4 years. ( ... )

Reply

dearmisterecho June 16 2009, 16:07:08 UTC
I don't remember precisely what happened, but this all reminds me of the 2000/04 election where there were more Republican votes than there were people in the entire county or something...like very obviously fixed voting results. Argh I wish I could remember what it was!

*goes on an 'election fraud" wiki spree*

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

dearmisterecho June 16 2009, 16:55:08 UTC
yeah! something like that...

Reply


ceilidh_ann June 16 2009, 15:44:08 UTC
'Mass opposition rally' in Tehran (BBC):
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/8103577.stm

Reply


Leave a comment

Up