Evidence of White Phosphorus use in Gaza

Jan 16, 2009 21:01

Video showing injuries consistent with the use of white phosphorus shells has been filmed inside hospitals treating Palestinian wounded in Gaza City ( Read more... )

biological weapons

Leave a comment

schexyschteve January 17 2009, 06:43:33 UTC
What is the point? People need to cut this petty shit out and quit fighting over a freaking PIECE OF LAND. Maybe I don't understand this whole conflict and the history of it, but this is ridiculous. That's one thing Catholics got right: making Vatican City its only country. Maybe if all the main holy cities were their own countries, this kind of stuff wouldn't happen.

Maybe I just don't understand...

Reply

schexyschteve January 17 2009, 06:46:48 UTC
Making Vatican City its own* country.

Reply

shuraiya January 17 2009, 07:11:56 UTC
Well, considering that Jerusalem is sacred to all three major western religions, that's... not going to happen anytime soon.

Reply

schexyschteve January 17 2009, 07:50:59 UTC
I know. Wishful thinking, I guess.

Reply

bay_bus_rider January 17 2009, 10:39:03 UTC
That's one thing Catholics got right: making Vatican City its only country.

They didn't really get it right, though, at least not intentionally. Their former territory, the Papal States (most of the central part of the peninsula), only became part of Italy by coercion.

Reply

valueablejunk January 17 2009, 12:37:12 UTC
that piece of land is peoples' homes and livelihoods though.
That's like saying those Native Americans were overreacting over the buffalo

Reply

this is tl;dr basically. bellichka January 17 2009, 13:03:07 UTC
Maybe I don't understand this whole conflict and the history of itNo offense, but it doesn't sound like you do. Honestly, I don't know if anybody does. But it's about a hell of a lot more than Jerusalem (which Gaza is not even near ( ... )

Reply

Re: this is tl;dr basically. j_daisy January 17 2009, 17:36:30 UTC
That is a ridiculous oversimplification. Both sides are at fault.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

Re: this is tl;dr basically. j_daisy January 17 2009, 19:09:34 UTC
I agree with you completely and believe that in order to move forward, both sides - not just the side that is in power - must amend their actions. But the person I was replying to chose to incorrectly explain the situation. Some of the comments I read hear (not what you just said) are unbelievable.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

Re: this is tl;dr basically. j_daisy January 17 2009, 19:26:09 UTC
Haha, pointing out that it was a poor analogy was my point but I don't mind getting into a conversation. : )

Where I disagree is where you can expect a group of people in extreme poverty, under an occupation, and also basically in a state of civil war with themselves, to act in a way that an established state would. Israel has the power in this situation, and thus has responsibilities that Palestine can't be expected to have.

I have so much sympathy for the people of Gaza right now and if I were one of them, it is very likely that Hamas would have had my vote. They have managed to provide jobs and food (not enough, though, but *just* enough), which I don't think any prior organization has managed to do. I do think that the people of that region need a leader like MLK or Ghandi, one who preaches non-violence because I have to believe that Israel would be willing to work with such a figure. Although Israel has been "winning," they certainly don't seem to be benefiting.

Reply

Re: this is tl;dr basically. bellichka January 17 2009, 20:50:06 UTC
It was a piss poor analogy, I'll give you that.

Please explain how.

Reply

Re: this is tl;dr basically. bellichka January 17 2009, 20:49:38 UTC
Please explain how I chose to incorrectly explain the situation.

Reply

Re: this is tl;dr basically. bellichka January 17 2009, 20:48:25 UTC
Then please explain to me how it's a "ridiculous oversimplification."

Reply

Re: this is tl;dr basically. j_daisy January 17 2009, 21:40:11 UTC
In the real world, Israel and the Palestinians weren't simply living "side by side," both sides were inflicting violence upon each other since 1948.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up