Seven people involved in the anti-federal government occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge have been found not guilty of conspiring to impede federal workers from doing their jobs, including Ammon and Ryan Bundy
( Read more... )
The way indigenous (UNARMED AND NONVIOLENT, unlike the a**holes above) protesters against the Dakota pipeline are being treated is nothing short of shameful.
If they were non-white or appeared to be they would have been shot dead and never made it to trial. =/
I know it would set a horrible precedent, but I'm starting to think those members of the jury should be charged with willful ignorance or some such thing because how in the ever-loving hell could they not see that this was absolutely a committed crime and that these idiots were 100% guilty?
Yes-- I think there would have been an armed shootout the first day of the incident, had the perpetrators not been white.
I wonder if the trial outcome was damaged by overreaching. As in, going for the heaviest possible charge-- whether or not it really fit-- instead of charges that unquestionably matched the crime. Because this WAS a crime.
And assholes like the Bundys do not deserve to just walk away from their messes. :(
Comments 13
Reply
Reply
Reply
I'll just leave this here, to contrast the way in which two standoffs were/are being dealt with:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/27/north-dakota-access-pipeline-protest-arrests-pepper-spray
The way indigenous (UNARMED AND NONVIOLENT, unlike the a**holes above) protesters against the Dakota pipeline are being treated is nothing short of shameful.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
HOW.
If these had been black or middle-eastern-looking guys, they'd be in jail for years on end.
They should have been convicted of SOMETHING for this-- criminal trespass and illegal possession of firearms in a public place, if nothing else.
And their mouthy, privileged lawyer... needs a smackdown. Ugh.
Reply
I know it would set a horrible precedent, but I'm starting to think those members of the jury should be charged with willful ignorance or some such thing because how in the ever-loving hell could they not see that this was absolutely a committed crime and that these idiots were 100% guilty?
Reply
I wonder if the trial outcome was damaged by overreaching. As in, going for the heaviest possible charge-- whether or not it really fit-- instead of charges that unquestionably matched the crime. Because this WAS a crime.
And assholes like the Bundys do not deserve to just walk away from their messes. :(
Reply
Leave a comment