A letter to incoming University of Chicago freshmen professed no support for “trigger warnings” or “safe spaces”
https://t.co/d2fpqCZ6ZQ- The New York Times (@nytimes)
August 27, 2016The anodyne welcome letter to incoming freshmen is a college staple, but this week the University of Chicago took a different approach: It sent new students a blunt
(
Read more... )
Hi there! I served 2 yrs as @UChicago student body president and was threatened with expulsion for helping to facilitate a sit-in on campus.
- Tyler Kissinger (@tylerbkissinger) August 25, 2016
I spent four years at the U of C, and consistently it was administrators who were the most coddled and safe-space-seeking people at UChicago
- Tyler Kissinger (@tylerbkissinger) August 25, 2016
Administrators (who for make decisions that have material implications on people's lives) regularly refuse to engage with challenging ideas.
- Tyler Kissinger (@tylerbkissinger) August 25, 2016
So, to get to the point: on so many of these issues, @UChicago is primarily interested in public perception & its bottom line
- Tyler Kissinger (@tylerbkissinger) August 25, 2016
Decision makers (Pres/Provost/BoT) rarely if ever directly interact with students & are kept insulated from any sort of "critical discourse"
- Tyler Kissinger (@tylerbkissinger) August 25, 2016
If you're interested, more on that here: https://t.co/UouKfVY1OK
- Tyler Kissinger (@tylerbkissinger) August 25, 2016
To close, safe spaces certainly exist at UChicago. But they exist for & are maintained by administrators, not students or community members.
- Tyler Kissinger (@tylerbkissinger) August 25, 2016
Reply
I agree that there is an element of publicity as the article states as well.
All that being said, i feel like more universities need to take this stance with students There is definitely a move to shut down people who aren't in agreement with the the majority and that is what needs to be addressed.
Reply
Leave a comment