People don’t take hurricanes as seriously if they have a feminine name and the consequences are deadly, finds a new groundbreaking study. Female-named storms have historically killed more because people neither consider them as risky nor take the same precautions, the study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences concludes
(
Read more... )
Comments 11
Reply
Reply
( ... )
Reply
Not only that, but as the years progress, we get better on average at not dying due to hurricanes. I just... this study just seems full of BS.
Reply
http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2014/06/02/why-have-female-hurricanes-killed-more-people-than-male-ones/
Reply
Like living where I do where the last one that had serious damage was Andrew I have no idea about hurricanes besides "be very careful" so of course I would treat it as dangerous but not flat out deadly. Whereas my relatives who live on the coast are a lot more prepared, a lot more aware, and a lot more knowledgeable.
It sounds like they were using college kids (in Illinois no less!! or the Internet!) as their testers in which case I'd hope they asked "where are you from" and looked at the pattern of hurricanes in their general area in relation to the person's age and background.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
I wonder if they controlled for the Category of the storm? If so, these are interesting findings. I'm willing to believe that unconscious gender bias plays a small role.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Leave a comment