Leave a comment

synthesizia April 17 2013, 04:18:11 UTC
Ahahahahaha! My but politicians are dumb! I love when Republicans get served.

Although I'll be honest with you, I think trolling is really lame and I'm judging Cohn's childish behavior for even starting it.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

hey_spectrum April 17 2013, 11:09:01 UTC
Where do/did you see disablist language? Genuinely curiuos if the comment was edited or what I'm not seeing here

Reply

lovedforaday April 17 2013, 12:29:34 UTC
they're probably talking about dumb

Reply

hey_spectrum April 17 2013, 14:20:15 UTC
Wait do you think dumb is ableist too?

Reply

lamardeuse April 17 2013, 13:04:17 UTC
It's the use of the words "dumb" and "lame", I believe.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

lovedforaday April 17 2013, 14:03:42 UTC
I don't think gay and lame are anyway comparable because hardly anyone knows the original meaning of lame and people know what gay means.

Reply

hey_spectrum April 17 2013, 14:28:11 UTC
I agree. The dictionary says lame is disabled as described above, but the other definition is "weak; inadequate; unsatisfactory; clumsy: ie a lame excuse." That's the way I'd always used it and read it in books. I can see how it (specifically using it to describe someone being clumsy) may be offensive in some situations but calling someone gay and lame are most definitely not comparable

Reply

silver_apples April 17 2013, 16:58:29 UTC
When I had a sign language course, we had to spend one day not speaking. One of my teachers made a joke about me being "dumb". In other discussions about ablist language that I've seen, people with disabilities have said others have made jokes about them being "lame". I remember a cartoon--aimed at children--with a "lame joke" represented by a person on crouches.

I agree the original use isn't as common as it is with "gay", but it is still there, still used, and well-known. It is used to hurt people, or to tease without thought to whether or not it's hurtful.

Reply

lovedforaday April 17 2013, 17:02:27 UTC
Yeah, I see what you're saying. While I don't think I would correct anyone who uses them, they're still words I'll try to remove from my everyday language.

Reply

silver_apples April 17 2013, 17:25:15 UTC
I avoid using the words online, because I never know who is reading and may be hurt by what I post, and I'm working on not using the words when talking (habits are hard to break), but I don't correct people IRL. Most of the people I know would think the objection was ridiculous because they have never been on the receiving end of that kind of teasing/bullying and don't know anyone who has. Also, language evolves, intent matters, out-of-control PC-ness, etc.

Reply

theguindo April 18 2013, 08:19:45 UTC
I've found "bogus" and "bummer" to be really good replacements in daily jargon for "lame", if you want suggestions. "That's bogus" & "What a bummer" vs "That's lame" & "How lame". You might sound a little dated but it covers the full spectrum of places you'd otherwise use "lame" without requiring any clumsy rephrasing.

I don't correct people on its use RL either. It doesn't offend me, so I don't feel it's worth my energy to try to enforce it, but it requires very little effort on my part to change my own behaviour to avoid offense.

Reply

hey_spectrum April 17 2013, 14:32:21 UTC
Interesting link. I had no idea the word weak was off limits too.

Reply

redstar826 April 17 2013, 14:52:00 UTC
if synthesizia had instead said "trolling is really gay", would you even have asked me where the homophobic language was?

can we not with this, please?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up