I agree. The dictionary says lame is disabled as described above, but the other definition is "weak; inadequate; unsatisfactory; clumsy: ie a lame excuse." That's the way I'd always used it and read it in books. I can see how it (specifically using it to describe someone being clumsy) may be offensive in some situations but calling someone gay and lame are most definitely not comparable
When I had a sign language course, we had to spend one day not speaking. One of my teachers made a joke about me being "dumb". In other discussions about ablist language that I've seen, people with disabilities have said others have made jokes about them being "lame". I remember a cartoon--aimed at children--with a "lame joke" represented by a person on crouches.
I agree the original use isn't as common as it is with "gay", but it is still there, still used, and well-known. It is used to hurt people, or to tease without thought to whether or not it's hurtful.
Yeah, I see what you're saying. While I don't think I would correct anyone who uses them, they're still words I'll try to remove from my everyday language.
I avoid using the words online, because I never know who is reading and may be hurt by what I post, and I'm working on not using the words when talking (habits are hard to break), but I don't correct people IRL. Most of the people I know would think the objection was ridiculous because they have never been on the receiving end of that kind of teasing/bullying and don't know anyone who has. Also, language evolves, intent matters, out-of-control PC-ness, etc.
I've found "bogus" and "bummer" to be really good replacements in daily jargon for "lame", if you want suggestions. "That's bogus" & "What a bummer" vs "That's lame" & "How lame". You might sound a little dated but it covers the full spectrum of places you'd otherwise use "lame" without requiring any clumsy rephrasing.
I don't correct people on its use RL either. It doesn't offend me, so I don't feel it's worth my energy to try to enforce it, but it requires very little effort on my part to change my own behaviour to avoid offense.
Although I'll be honest with you, I think trolling is really lame and I'm judging Cohn's childish behavior for even starting it.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
I agree the original use isn't as common as it is with "gay", but it is still there, still used, and well-known. It is used to hurt people, or to tease without thought to whether or not it's hurtful.
Reply
Reply
Reply
I don't correct people on its use RL either. It doesn't offend me, so I don't feel it's worth my energy to try to enforce it, but it requires very little effort on my part to change my own behaviour to avoid offense.
Reply
Reply
can we not with this, please?
Reply
Leave a comment