Italy’s Highest Court Overturns Acquittal of Amanda Knox

Mar 26, 2013 19:07

By ELISABETTA POVOLEDO
Published: March 26, 2013

ROME - Italy’s highest court on Tuesday ordered a new trial in the sensational case of Amanda Knox, an American student accused of murdering her 21-year-old roommate, Meredith Kercher of Britain, in 2007.The judges’ announcement that an earlier acquittal had been overturned was greeted by a shocked ( Read more... )

murder, crime, italy

Leave a comment

chaya March 27 2013, 14:29:14 UTC
I'm really unfamiliar with the details of this case - is there new evidence or evidence that turned out to be corrupted somehow? What's the reasoning behind opening this up again beyond "we didn't like the ruling"?

Reply

jettakd March 27 2013, 14:40:50 UTC
No new evidence to my knowledge. In fact, a lot of the original evidence was tainted by police. Whether she did it or not, the way it was handled by officials is really sketchy.

Reply

chaya March 27 2013, 14:46:03 UTC
So the evidence was biased in prosecution's favor, she got off even then, and they're trying her a second time?

Reply

world_dancer March 27 2013, 14:54:25 UTC
Prosecution messed up the evidence in the first trial, where she was found guilty.

That verdict was thrown out, and she got a SECOND trial. She was acquitted.

The acquittal has now been thrown out because the judges threw out DNA evidence in that one and the Supreme Court said they shouldn't have. They're now gearing up for the THIRD trial.

I haven't been following any further than that, and I have no opinion on if she's guilty or innocent. So far as I can tell, the evidence is so fucked up beyond belief, I don't really think there's anyway to conclusively prove things.

Reply

jettakd March 27 2013, 15:17:25 UTC
In addition to physical evidence, multiple witnesses changed their testimony. Stories of police harrassing to the point of breaking both Knox and other witnesses into "admitting" things they later recanted throws a lot of doubt onto the non-physical evidence as well.

Whether she did it or not, the evidence is so corrupted, the likelihood of any court proving she was involved is almost impossible.

Reply

bestdaywelived March 27 2013, 15:41:31 UTC
It's apparently just how things work in Italy.

Reply

moonshaz March 27 2013, 22:18:27 UTC
I think that, basically, the officials involved just don't want to admit that they fucked up royally. Because that is what they DID, and they seriously need to stfd.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up