I'm not sure about trigger warnings, but the article discusses abortion (with a dash of anti-choice rhetoric), reproductive coercion, disability & aborting due to birth defects, custody laws / adoption, and surrogacy / pregnancy. Please let me know if there is anything else I should include here (and Mods - let me know if you'd like this edited
(
Read more... )
Reply
seriously is nobody who thinks this also thinking of the dodgy precedent it sets?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
This is like a pro-choice equivalent of "exceptions in the case of rape", where someone's strongly held moral views are suddenly reversed when the right set of atypical circumstances crop up.
Reply
Leave a comment