Wall Street Journal Misrepresented Chua's Book on "Asian Parenting"
Follow-up to
this post, from a
review in the SF Chronicle, via the mothership:
The more I re-read the Wall Street Journal article, the more I felt like I wasn't getting the whole story. The "excerpt" made the book seem like a harsh diatribe against American parenting standards and
(
Read more... )
(The comment has been removed)
i don't understand this statement. she didnt create the persona. wsj did.
Reply
Are there really? I'm sure I can do some googling for myself, but if there are a few that stand out to you as the most interesting, I'd love a link or two. Even though my natural reaction to anything authoritarian is "squick," that sounds terribly interesting.
Reply
Even though I agree that she's promoting some really harmful parenting practices as if they are awesome
Except that the article cited in the OP explains that she's not:
"I was very surprised," she says. "The Journal basically strung together the most controversial sections of the book. And I had no idea they'd put that kind of a title on it. But the worst thing was, they didn't even hint that the book is about a journey, and that the person at beginning of the book is different from the person at the end -- that I get my comeuppance and retreat from this very strict Chinese parenting model."They misrepresented her on purpose, probably because they knew this model minority shit was going to sell more books. White people love to appropriate "Eastern" methods of ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment