Сколько стоит прокатиться на вертолете vs сколько, если пройти пешком

Sep 15, 2017 06:06


Не хотелось опять эксплуатировать эту тему, но больно хорошая демонстрация положения вещей. Тем более, что можно сравнить. Опять медицинская помощь. Два диаметрально противоположных случая и трудно выбрать какой из них более циничен. Каждый по-своему отвратителен, но у них одно общее: интересы общества. Вернее, отсутствие. В одном случае, наглая ( Read more... )

РФ, США, здравоохранение

Leave a comment

matrixmann September 16 2017, 14:55:33 UTC
Err... It's also a little hard to understanding everything properly.
You know, on a systematic level, it all leads to similar results. But the ways that lead there are all pretty different from each other. It simply has to do with the way those systems have developed in each country.
But based on that, there begins the deconstruction of illusions. That you can really say "this has a different look on the outside and a different way it works, but transmitted onto the people who have to live with it, it's just the same foul soup put into new cans.".
You know, for example, here you don't have to do as much with astronomically high bills to pay, but with just that missing, it doesn't mean it's paradise here. Then you got other tricks to get rid of people who needed medical help.
Just as I tried to explain it from my position, this way, e. g., is to keep you far away from doctors of specialized segments. Or that the doctors downplay shit to get you put onto a treatment that doesn't put as much ballast on the granted standard budget from the health insurance for treating you.
Result is the same: You don't pay endlessly high bills yourself, but you also don't get the treatment that you need.

People might just only focus on the first aspect, 'cause it's their own worst problem in their country, and conclude from it that such a system that doesn't have that must be paradise.
But if you live with it, or if you understand how it works together with the life circumstances common in a country, then you get to understand and tell to others "no, there's not a paradise".
You see, something can't be paradise if you know the average of the populace is much too poor to reach out to its benefits even though. Or if an already bigger part of the populace gets denied what they need from that system.
Understand what I mean?

Reply

onb2017 September 16 2017, 16:07:02 UTC
Yeah, I see, you need to live there to understand and if through bureaucracy or lack of access the benefits are not available what good are they? So gain we have to look at how many people are moving towards being poor and that's the better indicator of how things are, I guess.

Reply

matrixmann September 16 2017, 18:07:33 UTC
Well, I think you know from which point of approach I'm always trying to come from...
The general pattern lying open doesn't use anything if people don't find their own relation to it. If they can't see how the same thing is organized in their world.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up