Someone changed my background to all these crazy swastikas. I got a good chuckle out of it, but now I can't find my original background
( Read more... )
One more time. . .eyes_of_orionMay 13 2006, 14:09:32 UTC
. . .you're STILL stupid!
Let's spell it out, shall we?
I'm sure Sean ( the owner of the Livejournal ) understands bandwith theft. As do I.
I did not accuse Anonymous of breaking into anything.
Sean did not place the image as his background. Some other random person did. "Random Person" was who I accused.
Sean did not give anyone permission to change his background, enter his livejournal account, or use any image, hotlinked or not.
So how, pray tell, is it Sean's fault that Mr Anonymous is losing money? Yes, it's sad, yes, hotlinking is not very nice, but Sean didn't do it-- the person that changed his background did.
So it seems a little pointless to tell him that he's stealing and threaten him with lawsuits, because HE didn't DO anything, aside from ask the person who changed his background to kindly "choke on dick." You're targeting the innocent.
Sean and Mr Anonymous seem to have the same objective-- don't use hotlinked pictures to change peoples' backgrounds without permission.
Is that clear enough now? Or do I have to waste ANOTHER three minutes of my life writing ANOTHER rebuttal?
Two more times. . .meatfarleyMay 13 2006, 14:33:51 UTC
...you're SITLL stupiderer.
Indeed, we shall spell it out....
"I'm sure Sean ( the owner of the Livejournal ) understands bandwith theft. As do I."
Nope. Neither of you do apparently.
"Sean did not place the image as his background. Some other random person did. "Random Person" was who I accused."
No he didn't put the swastikas there. He was using another image being hosted on Jeremy's site. This makes Sean and inconsiderate prick. Jeremy went ahead and used a different image of the same name, thereby changing Sean's background WITHOUT having to "break into anything". You following me? Or should I whip out the HTML puppets?
Tard puppet: OMG my bkgrnd changed WTF? HTML puppet: You were hotlinking the image from another site without permission, so the file was changed. Tard puppet: WTFOMG someone hax0r3d my acct LOL!!1 HTML puppet: Again, no. You background image still is still iamaleech.com/bkg.jpg. The bkg.jpg file you were linking to is now an image of a swastika. This was all done on the domain hosting the image. Nothing was "hacked". Tard puppet: STFU stupid. NO WAI! HOW DID THSI HEPPAN!??? I nvr gave permisshuns?? OMGWTF? I nvr chnged it SO ti must b H4X0R3D!!
Re: Two more times. . .eyes_of_orionMay 13 2006, 15:18:46 UTC
. . .alright, I hereby give up because, not gonna lie, you just made my day a little better with the puppets. I probably still think you're wrong, and the puppets were an undisguised jab at my intelligence, but they were genuinely amusing and I've never been a fan of fighting through the internet. . . we've all heard the "fighting in the special olympics" thing, so let's just let it go.
Re: Two more times. . .eyes_of_orionMay 13 2006, 17:35:23 UTC
Actually the saying is "Fighting on the internet is like winning the special olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded." But thanks for playing!
Let's spell it out, shall we?
I'm sure Sean ( the owner of the Livejournal ) understands bandwith theft. As do I.
I did not accuse Anonymous of breaking into anything.
Sean did not place the image as his background.
Some other random person did.
"Random Person" was who I accused.
Sean did not give anyone permission to change his background, enter his livejournal account, or use any image, hotlinked or not.
So how, pray tell, is it Sean's fault that Mr Anonymous is losing money? Yes, it's sad, yes, hotlinking is not very nice, but Sean didn't do it-- the person that changed his background did.
So it seems a little pointless to tell him that he's stealing and threaten him with lawsuits, because HE didn't DO anything, aside from ask the person who changed his background to kindly "choke on dick." You're targeting the innocent.
Sean and Mr Anonymous seem to have the same objective-- don't use hotlinked pictures to change peoples' backgrounds without permission.
Is that clear enough now? Or do I have to waste ANOTHER three minutes of my life writing ANOTHER rebuttal?
Reply
Indeed, we shall spell it out....
"I'm sure Sean ( the owner of the Livejournal ) understands bandwith theft. As do I."
Nope. Neither of you do apparently.
"Sean did not place the image as his background.
Some other random person did.
"Random Person" was who I accused."
No he didn't put the swastikas there. He was using another image being hosted on Jeremy's site. This makes Sean and inconsiderate prick. Jeremy went ahead and used a different image of the same name, thereby changing Sean's background WITHOUT having to "break into anything". You following me? Or should I whip out the HTML puppets?
Tard puppet: OMG my bkgrnd changed WTF?
HTML puppet: You were hotlinking the image from another site without permission, so the file was changed.
Tard puppet: WTFOMG someone hax0r3d my acct LOL!!1
HTML puppet: Again, no. You background image still is still iamaleech.com/bkg.jpg. The bkg.jpg file you were linking to is now an image of a swastika. This was all done on the domain hosting the image. Nothing was "hacked".
Tard puppet: STFU stupid. NO WAI! HOW DID THSI HEPPAN!??? I nvr gave permisshuns?? OMGWTF? I nvr chnged it SO ti must b H4X0R3D!!
Reply
Reply
One would think that kids who grew up with ‘teh interwebs’™ would understand how it works.
Love, eureka
P.S. Get off my internet! *shakes fist*
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment