Comments | ohnotheydidnt: Katie Holmes' iPod birth

boomstick in ohnotheydidnt

Katie Holmes' iPod birth

Mar 29, 2006 08:15

LIFE STYLE EXTRA (UK) - Tom Cruise has reportedly given pregnant fiancée Katie Holmes an MP3 player loaded with mellow music to help her stay silent during childbirth ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Back to all threads

r1cepudding March 29 2006, 14:54:38 UTC

Whre do Scientologists stand on pain-relieving drugs? Is Katie allowed an epidural?

Not that a silent birth would be possible either way, hello. I'd like to see Tom Cruise shit a melon, whole, in total silence, making all his movements slow and understandable.

(The comment has been removed)

r1cepudding March 29 2006, 15:08:27 UTC

Good God. If everything else about Crazy Tom Cruise weren't enough, that *alone* would put me off having a baby with him.

Or for him, or whatever KH is doing. The whole thing is so ick.

asciident March 29 2006, 15:03:33 UTC

She probably gets a fistful of vitamins beforehand!

r1cepudding March 29 2006, 15:09:30 UTC

*laughs*

Yes, And some nice yoghurt. I also heard they take the baby away from her for a few days after birth. I hope she takes that kid and *runs*, man.

asciident March 29 2006, 15:10:17 UTC

From what I read, everyone is supposed to leave the baby alone for "a day or so", or something.

Whatever man, these people are fucking whacked.

r1cepudding March 29 2006, 15:12:54 UTC

On this website here it says Katie has refused the seperation part. But it also says the baby should not be bathed after birth.

Um. Okay? SO you're going to leave blood, goo and god knows what else all over it, wrap it in a blanket and *leave* it for a few days? NICE.

michi3183 March 29 2006, 15:18:23 UTC

When you say "leave" and "for a a day or so" does this mean that no one tends to the baby or just not the mother?

r1cepudding March 29 2006, 15:22:32 UTC

No idea. I'm just reading from websites and the like. I can't imagine the baby is supposed to be left completely alone though, on account of how it could die, and all.

The whole thing is just bizarre.

michi3183 March 29 2006, 20:09:18 UTC

right, that's what I thought but then again it's Scientology and I don't know.

ceterum_censeo March 29 2006, 15:18:41 UTC

i heard somewhere that its better for the babys skin to not wash it, but just wipe it down a little
i dont know how true this is, but its not the first time ive heard about it

r1cepudding March 29 2006, 15:23:42 UTC

*nods* Lots of people say not to wash the baby's skin with cleansers, but just to use water. But you need to clean the birth-goop off, otherwise it'll irritate the skin and go all crusty and yak, right? I Mean, *I* wouldn't be comfortable if I were covered in blood and wrapped in a blanket, and I have pretty tough old hide ;)

ceterum_censeo March 29 2006, 15:25:05 UTC

maybe just wipe it down VERY THOROUGHLY?

.. or with water...
meh i dont know

when i have a baby of my own ill ask the nurse and get back to you on that one :-D

imyourdaddynow March 29 2006, 15:39:30 UTC

I know some places actually save the goopy stuff babies are wrapped in after they're born and put it in moisturizers. Nasty, but it's supposed to be really good for your skin.

deerlike March 29 2006, 16:37:42 UTC

...

*takes a step away from her Aveeno lotion*

*eyes suspiciously*

lovedhurtlost March 29 2006, 17:03:25 UTC

lmao

Back to all threads