Selena Gomez Opens Up About Being Unable to Carry Her Own Children: 'That Was Something I Had to Grieve'
https://t.co/8y5mkuVmOr- People (@people)
September 9, 2024 Selena Gomez, 32, is opening up about her future motherhood plans.
“I haven’t ever said this...but I unfortunately can’t carry my own children,” Gomez said. “I have a lot of medical
(
Read more... )
But - is it worse to not be able to carry a child, or worse to not able to conceive? Because I feel like inability to carry is not a big deal if you're rich right? But don't want to speak out of turn
But also, fuck I have a cis married friend who so badly wants to have a kid, can physically do it, but financially can't bear it. It's hard these days
Reply
Reply
Reply
but then again there are people out there who try for years and years to get pregnant and never manage for whatever the reason. some people may even have the resources to put tens of thousands of dollars into it and still not get pregnant and i imagine that is also very difficult.
so yeah i couldn’t say one is harder than the other.
Reply
Reply
I think it depends a lot on whether you want a biological child. I know people who've done both... one used a surrogate because she couldn't carry, and the other used a donor egg and carried. It was really difficult for both of them, and so expensive. They were both so happy in the end getting their babies.
Personally, my first concern is for the woman enabling this process for someone else, either through egg donation or surrogacy. I think in her case, egg donation is much less invasive and challenging than going through a pregnancy! But it still involves paying women for their body parts/labor and that's not great.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment