Like many amateur photographers, I do occasionally experiment with editing. I wanted to express my apologies for any confusion the family photograph we shared yesterday caused. I hope everyone celebrating had a very happy Mother’s Day. C
- The Prince and Princess of Wales (@KensingtonRoyal)
March 11, 2024Kate Middleton revealed that she was the one
(
Read more... )
All these celebrities edit the photos they publish. We’ve had so many posts of the Getty Image vs IG post, so I’m honestly shocked people seem to want to attach or believe any conspiracy theories.
Reply
There’s been so much speculation about Kate, they then publish this weird AI type manipulated photo on Mother’s Day. Everyone realised it’s weird, and their excuse is that Kate went a bit nuts with Photoshop? Hilarious.
Reply
Reply
Reply
The mistakes are actually typical for combining different photos when you don't have the right eye for details. Then again Photoshop now has AI-supported tools so there's a bit of that, too.
If the picture were generated by AI you would have them melt into each other and at least one of the hands would have like 6 fingers. lol
Reply
There is a weird six fingered hand, and note how each kid coincidentally has crossed fingers? That could just be a nice family tradition, sure, or an AI glitch. George's hands also seem different sizes and Kate's seem to have that AI look to them too. Kate's shirt forgets it has a zipper at one point. George's teeth look off. Then there's all the issues with the clothing. To me this indicates more of a reliance on AI generation, although you're right that it might just be overlap between this and photoshop. Either way IMO this is not just a few tweaks or filters on an amateur photoshop, this was serious enough that the photo itself couldn't be considered authentic.
Reply
It absolutely is not a few filters that much I agree. But when I look at the picture I can literally see what tools have been used to piece together different parts from various photos. That's mostly just sloppy handiwork.
Reply
Reply
Oh, I'm very much aware of how good AI has become - which is exactly why I don't think this is made whole cloth by AI. It's hard to put into words but AI still has some issues that make it look very artificial to the trained eye. It often fools regular people though, that much is true. Idk how many versions it'll take until even professionals can't tell anymore.
However, the point I was trying to make is that there's a difference between already having the raw material in the form of several real photos that are then clumsily combined into one and being rendered by AI.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I don't think most care about it and imagine most celebs are editing pictures and putting them on Instagram but that's different to a news outlet publishing them, but for it to be such a reaction the digital analysis probably means it's more than a little editing.
Reply
That they issued a kill rather than an update shows the BRF were unwilling or unable to supply an unedited version.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment