Tommy Dorfman did not hold back about the low wage she received for season 1 of 13 Reasons Why - even as the series turned into a cultural phenomenon.
https://t.co/qwjeqKgLrQ- Us Weekly (@usweekly)
July 25, 2023Tommy Dorfman did not hold back about the low wage she received for season 1 of 13 Reasons Why, even as the series turned into a cultural
(
Read more... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
Streaming, the way I understand it, just seems a fundamentally flawed system, unfortunately. Most streamers, I believe, have yet to see any profit (Netflix might be the only one)
And that’s because the number of subscribers is obviously finite, there are no ads, and they insist on funnelling millions into a few awful movies a year (See The Grey Man)…I’m assuming that’s money they never get back.
Reply
But then look at what they proposed to pay some of their executives this year: "Executive Chairman Reed Hastings is set to receive a $500,000 salary and $2.5 million in stock. Co-CEOs Ted Sarandos and Greg Peters will each collect an annual salary of $3 million. Sarandos stands to receive an additional $20 million in stock, and is eligible for a bonus of up to $17 million. Peters will collect $17.3 million in stock and a bonus of up to $14.3 million."
All on all they were apparently set to spend $166 million in executive pay packages!!?1
Reply
Wasn’t the statement that the CEO of Disney once made 30x the amount of the “lowliest” employee, but now Iger makes 800x that.
But I still think there will have to be drastic changes made to streaming as we know it. It’s not sustainable.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment