A judge said she will throw out a lawsuit over a nude scene in the 1968 version of “Romeo and Juliet,” after finding that the film is protected by the First Amendment.
https://t.co/w8xjHRGumE- Variety (@Variety)
May 25, 2023 - Follow up to the
first post- The Judge (more or less) doesn't consider nudity pornographic, by default
(
Read more... )
Comments 28
Reply
I remember Cate Blanchett (or all people) defending some child nudity in photographs once years ago
"We should remember that an important index of social freedom, in earlier times or in repressive regimes elsewhere in the world, is how artists and art are treated by the state," said the letter.
"The intention of the art is not to titillate or to gratify perverse sexual desires, but rather to make the viewer consider the fragility, beauty, mystery and inviolability of the human body.
"The work itself is not pornographic, even though it includes depictions of naked human beings. It is more justly seen in a tradition of the nude in art that stretches back to the ancient Greeks, and which includes painters such as Caravaggio and Michelangelo."
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/may/28/australia.art
Reply
So exploiting children's bodies is fine as long as it's art? Lmao
Reply
Like apparently naming her kid after Polanski. 🤮
Reply
Reply
How is it not sexually suggestive? Isn't the nude scene centered around their having sex even if the act isn't shown?
Reply
( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment