Evan Rachel Wood Seemingly Supports Amber Heard, backtracks and compares her to Weinstein

Jul 21, 2022 10:45

Evan Rachel Wood has taken to Instagram and shared an article from the outlet We Got This Covered titled ​​"Anti-Amber Heard online campaign is straight-up cyberbullying," Wood shared the findings from a report by Bot Sentinel, a group dedicated to uncovering and exposing online bots ( Read more... )

violence / domestic abuse, amber heard, evan rachel wood

Leave a comment

escalena July 21 2022, 18:08:04 UTC
so the last story - if i understand correctly, is she calling Amber an abuser? because of the logic of "everyone in this pic is next to Amber and Amber is an abuser in my opinion, so everyone is as well"

The Harvey Weinstein comment also came out of nowhere, I was taken aback. Like this is a whole mess of internal monologue and analogies.

Reply

arabian July 21 2022, 18:14:05 UTC
It sure appeared that way to me. Look, I feel awful for what Evan went through with that disgusting piece of shit. But it doesn't make her shitting on Amber any less disgusting.

I remain beyond infuriated and heartsick over the treatment that Amber Heard continues to receive from people, non-famous and celebrities, alike. What the fuck is wrong with people?!

Reply

deja_vu822 July 21 2022, 18:28:45 UTC
i think what's she's saying here is extremely confusing and not well put, but my take of this in context with all of her stories was that she was trying to say she's chosen for years to not comment on this, either way. to not be for or against either of them. but no matter what, people still choose to infer that she believes one way or another even though her hard stance has always been "no comment". my understanding of the harvey weinstein comparison was just that people use those pics to prove she supports amber and her point is that she's never expressed any sentiment towards either of them.

Reply

escalena July 21 2022, 18:33:25 UTC
yeah i just went and checked out her stories after reading your other comment, and that seems to be what is happening here. she's trying to show or explain that her stance is an unwavering "no comment", and that's it.

I suppose how we each feel about that in light of what happened with Amber is another issue, but this isn't as black and white as previously thought. If anything it's No Comment lol.

Reply

winter_lace July 21 2022, 23:06:45 UTC
This was exactly how I read her stories. I didn’t realize that people interpreted them differently till I saw this post.

Reply

frejasface July 22 2022, 01:55:37 UTC
Yeah. She just didn't word it well.

Reply

glitterslugs July 21 2022, 18:51:23 UTC
I don’t know if she meant it that way, but that’s 100% what it reads as which is fucking dumb of her

Reply

until_you_leave July 21 2022, 19:20:34 UTC
yeah, i actually read her other stories, even the weinstein one, as her attempt to show that she has nothing to do with matter, doesn't want to be a part of the narrative, doesn't want her situation to turn into what happened with the depp and heard trial, and that their experience cannot be copy and pasted onto her experience.

but the last story? how is she not directly calling amber the abuser? her previous point - people who take photos with weinstein are not abusers. her second point reinforcing the first - people who take photos with amber are not abusers. even if she misspoke, that is what the story is saying.

Reply

escalena July 21 2022, 19:27:34 UTC
yeah it's strange. she could be using "abuser" towards amber hypothetically, but the pairing with weinstein whose abuser status is most def not hypothetical makes the whole thing terrible.

like i really can't tell what her stance is because she's adamant about not disclosing it and also because she just word vomited all over her stories

Reply

deja_vu822 July 21 2022, 19:37:17 UTC
i read that as her responding to the messages she's getting from debt supporters since she's also directly saying "stop sending me death threats" in that post - like i imagine the people sending her death threats are claiming she's an abuser or in the wrong in her own case against mm, but also aren't sending people like taylor lautner death threats for being in that pic.

Reply

wanderlost July 21 2022, 20:03:23 UTC
That's what I couldn't understand. It's either she's calling Amber an abuser, or the entire group is at a party/event with a now-known abuser and so it could seem like they supported that person. (For example, if the picture was taken at an R. Kelly concert FOR EXAMPLE.) But she didn't make it clear, so it just comes across as mean and mean.

Reply

irajaxon July 21 2022, 21:29:24 UTC
i think for these stories ( ... )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up