Leave a comment

Comments 116

racquelle2005 October 8 2019, 21:07:44 UTC
Pan and bi literally are the same SEXuality. No one is attracted to gender stereotypes.

Reply

eveofrevolution October 8 2019, 21:26:39 UTC
artemislives October 8 2019, 21:28:32 UTC
All that needs to be said tbh.

Reply

angriest_girl October 8 2019, 21:39:07 UTC
Right?

Reply


*looks at OP* allmylines October 8 2019, 21:08:44 UTC

... )

Reply

Re: *looks at OP* zoaster_toaster October 8 2019, 21:14:50 UTC
Such a useful gif

Reply

Re: *looks at OP* mondetriste October 8 2019, 23:30:52 UTC
Lmao at this point I’m convinced that this is fkatwigs or whoever

Reply

Re: *looks at OP* 3rdattemptuser October 9 2019, 00:53:21 UTC
i miss that insane bitch ngl

Reply


trendsnational October 8 2019, 21:12:58 UTC
There's been so much discourse about this on Twitter that I honestly don't think anyone knows what the fuck they're talking about.

Reply

zipster October 9 2019, 03:10:54 UTC
this. everyone is trying to out-woke each other and it's exhausting.

Reply


somthingshinyy October 8 2019, 21:13:11 UTC
Wouldnt the "everything in between" be people who are non-binary// gender non-conforming? Trans people would be included in the boys/girls part imo.

I don't understand the difference between pan and bi. I've never met a bi person who's against dating someone who's trans or non-binary. Why a new label...

Reply

eveofrevolution October 8 2019, 21:22:31 UTC
teenxwolf October 8 2019, 21:38:52 UTC
there doesn't seem to be a word for ppl that r attracted to cis men and cis women but not trans ppl (except transphobe i guess lol) i guess those ppl could call themselves bi

Reply

schmankerl October 8 2019, 21:44:39 UTC
I have no idea about this, but tbh I thought people had an issue with the expression "bisexual" because the "bi-" part implies that there are only two, and therefore the term technically doesn't include "everything in between" and that's why they don't like it.

Reply


thespockingdead October 8 2019, 21:13:37 UTC
Wouldn't trans boys and trans girls already be included in the part of the quote that.... mentions boys and girls?? Wouldn't listing it separately as "boys, girls, trans boys, trans girls, etc.", just further separate them??? The "everything in between" bit seems like it was more referring to people who don't say they're one specific gender (I don't know the right term).

Reply

elderpricely October 8 2019, 21:37:57 UTC
Wouldn't trans boys and trans girls already be included in the part of the quote that.... mentions boys and girls??

Yeah, it's weird that people assumed "everything in between" was a reference to trans people instead of non-binary, etc.

Reply

eldvno October 8 2019, 22:11:57 UTC
It really shows that deep down they know they aren't actually a boy/girl because if they did, they would automatically know "everything in between" refered to NB people. Tsk tsk

Reply

noskidaddle October 9 2019, 01:54:50 UTC
what an odd comment

Reply


Leave a comment

Up