Wouldnt the "everything in between" be people who are non-binary// gender non-conforming? Trans people would be included in the boys/girls part imo.
I don't understand the difference between pan and bi. I've never met a bi person who's against dating someone who's trans or non-binary. Why a new label...
there doesn't seem to be a word for ppl that r attracted to cis men and cis women but not trans ppl (except transphobe i guess lol) i guess those ppl could call themselves bi
I have no idea about this, but tbh I thought people had an issue with the expression "bisexual" because the "bi-" part implies that there are only two, and therefore the term technically doesn't include "everything in between" and that's why they don't like it.
Wouldn't trans boys and trans girls already be included in the part of the quote that.... mentions boys and girls?? Wouldn't listing it separately as "boys, girls, trans boys, trans girls, etc.", just further separate them??? The "everything in between" bit seems like it was more referring to people who don't say they're one specific gender (I don't know the right term).
It really shows that deep down they know they aren't actually a boy/girl because if they did, they would automatically know "everything in between" refered to NB people. Tsk tsk
Comments 116
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I don't understand the difference between pan and bi. I've never met a bi person who's against dating someone who's trans or non-binary. Why a new label...
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Yeah, it's weird that people assumed "everything in between" was a reference to trans people instead of non-binary, etc.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment