do you think they didn't know what Lombardo's purpose was, though? especially if they were asked to vouch for him bc the Times was writing an expose on him.
You wrote a paragraph, without even answering their question.
Do you actually believe these 2 were 100% unaware of WHY they were being asked to vouch for his credentials? It seems unlikely. I highly doubt they were just called and told "hey, tell these people I'm not a nobody!". This shit was pretty big, and they were likely aware as to WHY they were vouching for his credentials.
But, go on..cape those already known problematic White bros.
But I think she makes it clear in her story that the reason why Damon and Crowe were vouching for Lombardo was due to Weinstein telling them to do so/knowing that if Lombardo went down, Weinstein would go down, and in turn their movies wouldn't do well: "After intense pressure from Weinstein, which included having Matt Damon and Russell Crowe call me directly to vouch for Lombardo and unknown discussions well above my head at the Times, the story was gutted."
It seems to me that by defending the role of Lombardo, Damon and Crowe were really defending Weinstein against the allegations from the Times.
The whole thing is actually pretty sneaky and calculated by Weinstein.
The truth is that Matt Damon and Russel Crowe obviously knew what they were doing when they called the Times to quash the story. They did it as a favor to The Weinstein Company and they were aware of the harrassment allegations.
"After intense pressure from Weinstein, which included having Matt Damon and Russell Crowe call me directly to vouch for Lombardo and unknown discussions well above my head at the Times, the story was gutted." ?????
Wait so you really think Matt Damon and Russel Crowe called up this woman and told her Lombardo was a-ok, and she didn't bring up what she thought his real job was to get their assessment? Really girl? And like this is me giving them the benefit of the doubt, because there's 100% no reason to try to quash this story with their credibility unless they knew the alternative for his role she was going to present. They're not dumb, they know that if you're going to accuse someone in the public of not having a real job, you're also going to have to put into print why you think they're in a certain role.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Do you actually believe these 2 were 100% unaware of WHY they were being asked to vouch for his credentials? It seems unlikely. I highly doubt they were just called and told "hey, tell these people I'm not a nobody!". This shit was pretty big, and they were likely aware as to WHY they were vouching for his credentials.
But, go on..cape those already known problematic White bros.
Reply
It seems to me that by defending the role of Lombardo, Damon and Crowe were really defending Weinstein against the allegations from the Times.
The whole thing is actually pretty sneaky and calculated by Weinstein.
Reply
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
"After intense pressure from Weinstein, which included having Matt Damon and Russell Crowe call me directly to vouch for Lombardo and unknown discussions well above my head at the Times, the story was gutted." ?????
Hmmm....
Reply
Damon and Crowe were obviously acting under Weinstein orders and it's highly unlikely the Times did not mention what the allegations were.
Reply
Reply
op is out to end careers
Reply
Reply
I'm still enjoying OP's attempt though! Its inspired!
Reply
Leave a comment