Leave a comment

kjesta February 11 2017, 15:06:54 UTC
I still haven't made it past p.130 of the first book. Don't care for the characters, the writing style is inoffensive but nothing special, the premise is OK I guess? But it's mostly just a big blob of meh.

The Bartimaeus trilogy definitely deserves an adaptation, and a TV series at that IMO. It's so good at character development, funny, whip-smart. And now that I'm older I also recognize that it actually speaks of the cyclical nature of oppressive power structures and imperialism. One of the few books that only get better as I age.

I also liked "Rivers of London", I only wish the narrator spent less time detailing how fuckable each woman is he comes across, ugh. Bc otherwise that book was rly good, and it goes in on racism and prejudices etc.

Reply

therearewords February 11 2017, 15:12:41 UTC
Barti, yes!

Reply

tanglespiders February 11 2017, 15:44:01 UTC
I'm not entirely caught up on Rivers of London, but ia about everything

Reply

nichcola February 11 2017, 16:10:59 UTC
I am loving the Rivers of London series, but I agree about the narrator.

Reply

sivartt February 12 2017, 02:33:52 UTC
i did a reread of the bartimaeus books in december and they're still so good. his lockwood series is fun too.

Reply

kjesta February 12 2017, 08:28:28 UTC
I've read all LW books so far and I think they're pretty good, but not as good as Barti. I'm rly annoyed by how Lockwood is basically Nathaniel with the swooshy coat and floppy hair but just played entirely straight? And I hate Lucy's irrational "I'm not like other girls, I hate girly girls, ugh" shtick.

Otherwise they're rly well-written, I loved the first one the most <3

Reply

shahrazade_bard February 12 2017, 20:19:30 UTC
I agree. I thought it was okay, but didn't find the story particularly compelling either. Finished the first book, but didn't make it any farther then that. Maybe a live-action adaptation will be more interesting.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up