these colors don't run
as a courtesy i'm putting this under a lj-cut. but do check it out if you're at all interested...
( so you call yourself a liberal. here is what you stand for. )
( so you call yourself a liberal. here is what you stand for. )
1. first of all, you cannot make statements such as bush went to war for oil because there is no proof for that. you are free to think that; however, it's an unsubstantiated claim. secondly, it's not true that most nations don't support him. i suggest you look up a list of our allies in this war. there are a few vocal opponents, but there are many staunch supporters.
2. private assemblies have the constitutional right to exclude people on practically any basis (except for race). while i do not completely agree with this practice, the reason they do it is because the dissenters disrupt the gathering. the protesters, on the other hand, weren't protesting merely the location; they just had a stick up their ass against the republicans.
3. okay...?
4. what does that have to do with anything? the fact is that the democrats honored him by having him speak at theirs, while demanding that bush denounce the swift boat PAC.
5. separation of church and state is one thing; taking "under god" out of the pledge of allegiance is another. do you know that in some public schools it is forbidden to pray in public? for instance, if i wanted to do the sign of the cross before taking a test, i could get in trouble. THAT to me is ridiculous. liberals hate god. they find him and religion really offensive for some reason. i don't know why.
6. our troops are still in afghanistan. the news doesn't report much on it.
7. i never said liberals don't support our troops. straw man, zoe (heh, ap joke.. i know, i'm a dork). how do you want a president to lead a war if he doesn't believe in it in the first place? if he called the soldiers "babykillers"?
8. the thing is, bureaucratic governments are REMARKABLY inefficient at handling money. there is so much tax money that is going to waste, it's insane. and it's not true that some of the richest members of society pay no taxes at all. believe it or not, tax cuts make things better for the poor, too.
9. alright. we can come to some sort of consensus here.
10. i disagree with that definition. a fetus that is able to survive once removed from the "host being" is, by all definitions, one that is able to survive on its own... me climbing inside a fetus doesn't change the fact that i'm able to survive on my own. and of course the death penalty must be used cautiously.
11. well... by all standards, right-wing tends to be republican. yes, bush is a polarizing figure, but clearly so in the republican sphere. as to jfk being president during the cuban missile crisis, i have one word for you: brinkmanship. possibly the most dangerous and risky foreign policy EVER.
Reply
the most powerful of our supporters are pulling out and most of these country have 1000 or fewer troops. france and germany have allied against us.
but, i thought your point was that it was alright that george bush had no support from the world and neither did clinton, so i'm confused
2.i don't know when you mean about liberal's opposing the RNC. if it's just saying "hey, we're angry about this" i don't think there's a law against that either.
3. eh
4. though moore's facts were very very biased- the swift boat veterans were proven to have lied. moore may have distorted the facts-but the swift boat veterans created them. i don't really care that bush didn't denounce the swift boat veterans since we all knew they were full of shit anyway-so, no, not every liberal really cared that he didn't.
5. taking "under god" out is a little extreme, i admit, however, in some public schools it is ALSO FORBIDDEN TO SPEAK OF THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION. a prayer is one thing [i think people should have a right to pray whenever, wherever] but to denounce a scientific fact for the sake of religion is, well, ridiculous. i also cannot believe you said liberals hate god. that really bothers me. i don't hate god. i just don't believe in the same god that some other people believe in. if that is hating god [i.e., having some sort of different religion all my own and not conforming to christianity, catholisism and or evangelical christianity] then yes, i guess i do hate god.
6. SOME of our troops in afghanistan. but, your point was that we don't care. and if troops are there and liberals supported that war, how can we not care?
7. kerry doesn't believe in the war. that doesn't mean he's gonna get up and take all the troops out. does that mean to be president you have to believe in every single thing the previous president believed in? should he compromise his opinion in order to follow bush? no-he didn't believe in the war but he agreed that once we got ourselves into this logical blackhole he would do everything in his power to make it work.
8. there is money to going to waste, namely 120 billion going to the war [and he's asking for more]. however, taxes are necessary and to believe they are evil is just...well, that's weird. and there are actual statistics proving the rich people get the better end of the stick.
9. agreed
10. i don't really think third-trimister fetuses (feti?) should be aborted unless the pregnancy endangers the mother's life. however, this argument doesn't make sense when compared to the argument against stem cell research. an embryo cannot survive on its own, therefore, nobody should have any problem with stem cell research. and i do agree with you once again about the death penalty.
11. i do agree that bush is clearly in the republican sphere. but my last and most nonsequitar point is, even the most dangerous and risky foreign policy did not errupt in nuclear obliteration.
and i'm done. my fingers hurt and i'm going to bed. and i'm thinking how in the long run, this disagreement doesn't really matter anyway. eh, what are you gonna do
Reply
Leave a comment