I'm not sure I'm as an advocate of freedom of choice as I think I am. There seems to be some complication with inequalities, due to everyone else's lack of responsibility(?), and it's practically unnecessary for people to die and barely survive within a world where others are living luxuriously; I doubt the aforementioned chose that fate. It all
(
Read more... )
On another note, if one objects to the act of killing, one shouldn't kill someone for any reason since the individual probably believes in the universal preservation of life. Objecting to the lives of innocents also gets tricky because when does one draw the line between who deserves to live and who deserves death (ie where does the American government get off by using the death penalty? sorry, tangent, continuing). The death of innocents gets into some pretty hazy moral ground.
I agree with the social resonsibility though. I think those in power should use it for good (although now I sound like I'm advocating superheros). Possibly not unjust, but I would say selfish. People in power often don't like to sacrifice comfort because they believed that they've earned it when they don't realize that most people born into difficult situations have a lower probability of getting out than people born in high society. Sure, it isn't a rich person's fault that there are starving children, but while I don't think they are necessarily obligated to help out, I think helping is the morally correct thing to do.
-Layne
Reply
Morally correct.. agreed, although too bad it's mostly acknowledged only in theory or concept. Maybe unjust sounds too brutal, or moral even, but it practically is.
You might agree too, but as social responsibility may not sound exactly fair in a country not founded on it, it's easily understood that corporation and economics, which justifies capitalism, has taken over any morality this country was founded on (for the most part). If social responsibility were to have any legal influence, I'd start with business. Although, why am I ranting.
Reply
When do you come back from State?
-Layne
Reply
Social responsibility.. at least for businesses, maybe some law that says if a town is economically dependant on a business there, they can't pick up and leave as they deem necessary, but that goes into a lot of complications.. I don't know.
Reply
Leave a comment