Relax, everybody. We may lick our wounds today, but once again, the math speaks loudly against Clinton EVER beating Obama in pledged delegates. It's virtually impossible, no matter how much Clinton spins it!
Continuing my
previous delegate math postLet's look at what REALLY happened last night. I used the most accurate delegate numbers I could
(
Read more... )
Comments 15
Reply
Reply
Reply
Clinton Wins Big, But Math is Troubling (Time):
"Given the remaining contests - many with electorates favorable to Obama - Obama's existing hundred-plus delegate lead, and the rules by which Democrats apportion delegates, it is almost a political and mathematical certainty that Obama will have an elected delegate lead at the end of the process, barring dramatic, unforeseen circumstances.
Some of the upcoming states to vote - including Wyoming on Saturday and Mississippi on March 11 - are likely to swing strongly for Obama, and certainly show no signs of being Clinton blowouts. The same goes for North Carolina on May 6, and Oregon on May 20.
Other contests might be more favorable for Clinton (Pennsylvania, Indiana, Guam, West Virginia, Montana, and South Dakota), but even decisive wins in those states - say, in the 60-40 range-would still leave her behind in both elected delegates and the overall count. That remains true even if Clinton somehow succeeds in getting the disputed delegates from Florida and Michigan ( ... )
Reply
Reply
The delegate counter makes me feel good, considering you gave her every state by 10 % (which is highly unlikey) So I too am now breathing easier...
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment