When I saw the domination of this year's Hugo finalists by a slate of works nominated by a misogynist racist and his colluders, my immediate reaction was that I should vote "No Award" ahead of every one of their nominations, no questions asked or quarter given. (I was
not alone.)
There has been some debate about this in the last week. Notably,
(
Read more... )
So far, the worst they've done is vote for a slate of nominations: it's not the worst thing they can do.
This isn't about ethics in games journalism; and neither was 'Gamergate'; it was and is about a hate campaign, and people who pursue it with passionate malice. They're here, and they were invited.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
That said, the mechanics of the vote are much more complex than any of the puppies I've spoken to seem to understand.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment