One of the things that I've found fascinating this last year - having started reading several Doctor Who review/commentary sites - is the total lack of consistency of what is 'good Who' and what is 'bad Who'.
For example, Sandifer and his commenters generally regard the Lawrence Miles-conceived parts of the Faction Paradox stories to be brilliantly clever and original and The Ancestor Cell to be an abomination that completely ruins the concept, while others think...differently.
Comments 1
For example, Sandifer and his commenters generally regard the Lawrence Miles-conceived parts of the Faction Paradox stories to be brilliantly clever and original and The Ancestor Cell to be an abomination that completely ruins the concept, while others think...differently.
Reply
Leave a comment