The House of Lords has near-zero political power*, and a grand tradition of its members speaking on whatever they feel like or find interesting. Sometimes this results in hugely erudite speeches from someone with sixty years of experience and a classical education, delivered to an empty chamber. Sometimes it results in blather, injokes, motions on matters of no importance, and genteel snide remarks.
* While the Lords has a tendancy to vote against bills in recent years that reduce ancient liberties, like the right to trial by jury, due to the Parliament Act in any direct conflict between the Lords and Commons, the Commons always wins.
This is why I'm always dubious about proposals for reforming the House of Lords. I'm not really sure the gain in democracy would offset the loss of comedy.
I thought it was customary in the Lords not to refer directly to the House of Commons, but to use a euphemism like "the other place". Or have I got that backwards, and it's the Commons that does that with the Lords?
If I remember aright, a Noble Lord/Lady may refer to legislation enacted in Another Place, but would refer to an MP as a member of the House of Commons (Member of Parliament not being specific enough).
Comments 14
Reply
Reply
Reply
* While the Lords has a tendancy to vote against bills in recent years that reduce ancient liberties, like the right to trial by jury, due to the Parliament Act in any direct conflict between the Lords and Commons, the Commons always wins.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I thought it was customary in the Lords not to refer directly to the House of Commons, but to use a euphemism like "the other place". Or have I got that backwards, and it's the Commons that does that with the Lords?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment