Hey... I wouldn't trust a hacker any futher than I could throw them. =) Well ... make that not even as far as I could throw them.
I'll give you seven reasons why I think you are who you say you aren't: (1) A hacker would make a bigger deal about having hacked in to an LJ account and would prove it -- like by deleting all the past LJ posts. Do that and I'd have more than a little faith... (2) The real Joanna and Bethany and etc. Pinzurs would be outraged and screaming out in protest of this hacker who is not. (3) You sound like Joanna as much as you try not to. The sentences and punctuation quirks are Joanna-esque. (4) What you said to Samuel made best sense for the real Joanna to say... sense she would know her own password and a hacker would not necessarily. (5) You've shown no plausable motive for hacking (dramatization makes just as much sense for Joanna as for a hacker). (6) A hacker would not feel "evil" -- it shows a sense of morality I don't think they would have. (7) A hacker would not have locked the post.
Ah hah... *thinking* Well, I agree that (1) and (2) are flaws in my thinking, but I don't assume that you are a hacker just because I refer to you in the 3rd person above. I love that line of reasoning, though: I assume you are a hacker, therefore you are more credibly a hacker. lol. That's like saying that if I assume the moon is made of cheese, it's more credibly a cheesy moon. Plus if I really do assume you are a hacker then your job is done; you don't need to further convince me. That means that you must not really believe that I really assume that you are a hacker, otherwise you would not try to convince me that you are a hacker by saying that I assume you are a hacker because you would know already that I do assume that you are a hacker...
Your credibility as a would-be hacker is still minuscule, even with that little boost.
Sorry for the delay... this "hacker" has had a busy week.
#3 was a reference to your absolute way of thinking. You only allow yourself 2 possibilities. Either I am Joanna or I am a hacker. You disproved I was a hacker so you know I must be Joanna. HOWEVER! Let me appeal to you that you need to add a larger category to your thinking. Maybe I am neither Joanna nor a hacker. There is more to life than 2 possibilities!
Since you posted anonymously, I tend to agree with you. You may not be anyone I know; or you may be Aaron, Tommy, or Charity for all I know! =D You didn't write enough for me to really determine.
But, my guess is that this is still Joanna. You could be Joanna and a hacker, but I don't believe that you would hack your own journal or go to such length to actually do it when you could just pretend you did it -- as you did. Yes, you could be one of Joanna's siblings or some close friend who did not hack into her account, but that seems highly unlikely. What purpose would it serve? An alibi is still lacking for the crime. =P
There... that covers the 4 possibilities: 1) You are Joanna and a hacker 2) You are Joanna and not a hacker 3) You are not Joanna and you are a hacker 4) You are not Joanna and you are not a hacker.
oh grr, whatever. This is getting rather pointless. I now command Joanna to POST! Give me due credit and make me sound ingenious... all that good stuff.
Reply
Reply
You definitely are Joanna, though. Uploading someone else's face won't convince me otherwise. =)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
I'll give you seven reasons why I think you are who you say you aren't:
(1) A hacker would make a bigger deal about having hacked in to an LJ account and would prove it -- like by deleting all the past LJ posts. Do that and I'd have more than a little faith...
(2) The real Joanna and Bethany and etc. Pinzurs would be outraged and screaming out in protest of this hacker who is not.
(3) You sound like Joanna as much as you try not to. The sentences and punctuation quirks are Joanna-esque.
(4) What you said to Samuel made best sense for the real Joanna to say... sense she would know her own password and a hacker would not necessarily.
(5) You've shown no plausable motive for hacking (dramatization makes just as much sense for Joanna as for a hacker).
(6) A hacker would not feel "evil" -- it shows a sense of morality I don't think they would have.
(7) A hacker would not have locked the post.
...
LOL.
Reply
1)You assume you understand hackers and that all hackers are the same.
2)You assume you understand Joanna.
3)You assume I am a hacker.
Reply
Your credibility as a would-be hacker is still minuscule, even with that little boost.
Reply
#3 was a reference to your absolute way of thinking. You only allow yourself 2 possibilities. Either I am Joanna or I am a hacker. You disproved I was a hacker so you know I must be Joanna. HOWEVER! Let me appeal to you that you need to add a larger category to your thinking. Maybe I am neither Joanna nor a hacker. There is more to life than 2 possibilities!
Reply
Since you posted anonymously, I tend to agree with you. You may not be anyone I know; or you may be Aaron, Tommy, or Charity for all I know! =D You didn't write enough for me to really determine.
But, my guess is that this is still Joanna. You could be Joanna and a hacker, but I don't believe that you would hack your own journal or go to such length to actually do it when you could just pretend you did it -- as you did. Yes, you could be one of Joanna's siblings or some close friend who did not hack into her account, but that seems highly unlikely. What purpose would it serve? An alibi is still lacking for the crime. =P
There... that covers the 4 possibilities:
1) You are Joanna and a hacker
2) You are Joanna and not a hacker
3) You are not Joanna and you are a hacker
4) You are not Joanna and you are not a hacker.
So... #2 still fits best. =)
Reply
Sincerly,
not-Joanna
Reply
Reply
I'm not, I AM NOT! joanna. grrr, Have a little faith, guys...
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment